2014
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motion Alterations After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of the Injured and Uninjured Lower Limbs During a Single-Legged Jump

Abstract: Context: Asymmetries subsist after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), and it is unclear how lower limb motion is altered in the context of a dynamic movement.Objective: To highlight the alterations observed in the injured limb (IL) during the performance of a dynamic movement after ACL-R.Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 11 men (age ¼ 23.3 6 3.8 years, mass ¼ 81.2 6 17.0 kg) who underwent ACL-R took part in this study 7.3 6 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report LSIs in this study ranging between 67% and 74%, depending on the method of scoring. This asymmetry is similar to previous studies for vertical hopping that report LSIs ranging between 74% and 76% at a similar time point after ACLreconstruction (de Fontenay et al, 2014, Gustavsson et al, 2006, Petschnig et al, 1998. Furthermore, these values were lower (i.e., greater asymmetry) than LSIs reported for horizontal hopping (Gustavsson et al, 2006, Thomee et al, 2012, Petschnig et al, 1998.…”
Section: Differences Between Limbs and Groupssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We report LSIs in this study ranging between 67% and 74%, depending on the method of scoring. This asymmetry is similar to previous studies for vertical hopping that report LSIs ranging between 74% and 76% at a similar time point after ACLreconstruction (de Fontenay et al, 2014, Gustavsson et al, 2006, Petschnig et al, 1998. Furthermore, these values were lower (i.e., greater asymmetry) than LSIs reported for horizontal hopping (Gustavsson et al, 2006, Thomee et al, 2012, Petschnig et al, 1998.…”
Section: Differences Between Limbs and Groupssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Because its slats are at half inch intervals, this method lacks precision for detecting between-limb differences in height when compared to other methods. This is especially true for detecting differences in single limb hop height, where the height for most individuals is less than 10 inches (Gustavsson et al, 2006, Ageberg et al, 2008, de Fontenay et al, 2014. The jump and reach method used with the Vertec also lacks accuracy compared to other methods like contact mats and force platforms (Leard et al, 2007).…”
Section: Hop Testing In Orthopaedic Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with previous studies [36,38,40], the first group included 12 males who had undergone unilateral bone-patellar-tendon-bone autograft ACL-R after isolated ACL injury. The surgeries were performed by 2 experienced surgeons from the same orthopedic department.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, during the push-off phase of a single-leg jump, some studies observed a smaller range of motion of the knee [38], ankle and hip [39] for IL in comparison to NIL. From a mechanical point of view a lower ankle [40] and knee joint power [38] was observed for IL in comparison to NIL. Although these studies gave insights about the lower limb asymmetries after ACL-R, each joint was assessed independently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%