2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnn.2010.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mothers' mood and perceptions regarding their preterm infants' behavioral state following a feeding intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, research on both forms of the measure is relevant for the following literature review. The PANAS has been used in studies covering various populations, including both clinical and nonclinical participants, such as mothers of preterm infants, job applicants, polio survivors, medical rehabilitation patients, and athletes (Burger & Caldwell, 2000; Crawford & Henry, 2004; Cuellar & Hill, 2010; Kwon, Kalpakjian, & Roller, 2010; Ostir, Smith, Smith, & Ottenbacher, 2005; Tuccitto et al, 2010). The psychometric properties of the PANAS have been relatively well-researched, and the measure has consistently been identified as a reliable and valid measure of positive and negative affect (Crawford & Henry, 2004; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).…”
Section: Assessment Of Positive and Negative Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, research on both forms of the measure is relevant for the following literature review. The PANAS has been used in studies covering various populations, including both clinical and nonclinical participants, such as mothers of preterm infants, job applicants, polio survivors, medical rehabilitation patients, and athletes (Burger & Caldwell, 2000; Crawford & Henry, 2004; Cuellar & Hill, 2010; Kwon, Kalpakjian, & Roller, 2010; Ostir, Smith, Smith, & Ottenbacher, 2005; Tuccitto et al, 2010). The psychometric properties of the PANAS have been relatively well-researched, and the measure has consistently been identified as a reliable and valid measure of positive and negative affect (Crawford & Henry, 2004; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).…”
Section: Assessment Of Positive and Negative Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%