Mothers’ experiences of perinatal care in Belgian public hospitals: exploring the social inequalities. Protocol for a cross-sectional survey

Abstract

IntroductionIn Europe, the social inequalities in perinatal health are usually found to be to the disadvantage of non-European immigrants and women with lower levels of education and income. Among the possible underlying mechanisms are inadequate access to healthcare services and suboptimal care. To explore this hypothesis in the Belgian context, our research will describe detailed maternal socioeconomic and migration characteristics, explore how these factors relate to each other, and how they relate to women’s perinatal care trajectories and experiences of care.MethodsUsing a modified version of the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire, we will survey 900 mothers of Belgian nationality or a nationality from a North or Sub-Saharan African country, and having given birth in four maternity wards in Brussels. The questionnaire has been adapted to the study objectives and the Belgian context. Interviewers will administer the 116-item questionnaire to all women agreeing to participate and meeting inclusion criteria, within 14 days of having given birth. Clinical information will be extracted from hospital records.AnalysisWe will estimate the associations of women’s socioeconomic and migration characteristics with:Women’s antenatal care trajectories (timing of first antenatal consultation, minimum recommended number of consultations, and problems accessing care).Obstetric practices such as episiotomies, emergency caesarean sections, and inductions.Patient experience such as feelings of discrimination, respect, and understanding of information.We will use descriptive statistics, multiple correspondence analysis, and simple and multiple logistic regressions.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the hospital Ethics Committees and from the Université libre de Bruxelles (No: P2017/055/B406201730877). Written informed consent will be sought from all participants.In addition to disseminating findings and recommendations to the scientific community through open-source journal articles and conferences, we will also address local organisations and healthcare professionals via a written report and seminars.

The highly complex phase of intrapartum management: when clinical and medico-legal aspects overlap

“…Our analysis of the research findings has highlighted that there is no universally acknowledged approach regarding the management of intrapartum phase, and some manoeuvres frequently used in the obstetric-gynaecological field could be perceived from the women as dangerous on the psycho-physical integrity of the pregnant women and unborn children [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, some of the authors [4,[15][16][17][18][19][20] believe that universally recognized guidelines are needed in order to provide guidance and legitimize the activity of the obstetrician in intrapartum management.…”

A 5 years’ experience of a parent-baby day unit: impact on baby’s development

“…Nevertheless, it is imperative to consider the seriousness of this vulnerability, since it will be added, for some parents, to psychopathology and/or traumas experienced in childhood. The interplay between socioeconomic factors, migration history and perinatal health is widely described in the literature ( 56 , 57 ). However, unlike what has been shown in previous studies ( 58 ), none of the economic or social variables considered individually, is associated with a pejorative outcome of hospitalization in our study.…”

Country of birth as a potential determinant of inadequate antenatal care use among women giving birth in Brussels. A cross-sectional study

“…This observational cross-sectional study included 932 women interviewed in hospital within two weeks of having given birth. The detailed methodology has been published elsewhere [18].…”