Mother–offspring competition promotes colonization success

Abstract

Colonization is the crucial process underlying range expansions, biological invasions, and metapopulation dynamics. Which individuals leave their natal population to colonize empty habitats is a crucial question and is presently unresolved. Dispersal is the first step in colonization. However, not all dispersing individuals are necessarily good colonizers. Indeed, in some species, the phenotype of dispersers differs depending on the selective pressures that induce dispersal. In particular, kin-based interactions, a factor driving social evolution, should induce different social response profiles in nondispersing and dispersing individuals. Kin competition (defined here as between the mother and offspring) has been proven to produce dispersers with a particular phenotype that may enhance their colonizing ability. By using the common lizard (Lacerta vivipara), we conducted a multipopulation experiment to study the effect of kin competition on dispersal and colonization success. We manipulated mother-offspring interactions, which are the most important component of kin competition in the studied species, at the family and population levels and measured the consequences on colonization success. We demonstrate that mother-offspring competition at the population level significantly influences colonization success. Increased competition at the population level enhanced the colonization rate of the largest juveniles as well as the growth and survival of the colonizers. Based on these results, we calculated that kin-induced colonization halves the extinction probability of a newly initiated population. Because interactions between relatives are likely to affect the ability of a species to track habitat modifications, kin-based dispersal should be considered in the study of invasion dynamics and metapopulation functioning.common lizard ͉ dispersal ͉ kin interactions

The heritability of brain metabolites on proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in older individuals

“…Heritability studies of brain function are uncommon. One study showed no genetic influences on brain activation in response to sad stimuli (Cote et al, 2007) whereas 43% heritability for default-mode network in the posterior cingulate region (Glahn et al, 2010) and 40-65% heritability for task-related brain activations (Blokland et al, 2011) have been observed.…”

The pros and cons of applying the movement ecology paradigm for studying animal dispersal

“…We decided thus to walk here on the empiricist side and to complement this theoretical exercise by selected examples drawn from real organisms. In experimental conditions, common lizards exposed to kin competition dispersed in more risky conditions than those being confronted to the competition with non kin individuals [29,30]. In the two spotted mite, relatedness, but not density, changes the shape of the dispersal kernel towards a more skewed and leptokurtic shape including a longer dispersal distance when kin competition occurs [31].…”

An empiricist's guide to theoretical predictions on the evolution of dispersal

“…For example, empiricists have shown great interest in testing whether and why dispersal could be sex-biased [31,166,167], condition-dependent (depending on food level [168], on the local density of conspecifics [155], on brood size [169], on parasite load [156] or on temperature [170]) or in testing whether habitat persistence [153], kin competition [155,171,172] or habitat fragmentation [154,173] actually affect the evolution of dispersal. Other related issues with potential immediate applications, e.g.…”