2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9900-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mother–child interaction: a qualitative investigation of imprisoned mothers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has specifically noted that criminally involved women separated from their children are actively concerned with the well-being of those children (Gilham, 2012; Shamai & Kochal, 2008). Furthermore, these children also provide important emotional support for mothers in the system (Rahimipour Anaraki & Boostani, 2014). One study conducted by Baker et al (2010) found that greater social support and co-parenting while incarcerated was associated with more positive parenting post-release.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has specifically noted that criminally involved women separated from their children are actively concerned with the well-being of those children (Gilham, 2012; Shamai & Kochal, 2008). Furthermore, these children also provide important emotional support for mothers in the system (Rahimipour Anaraki & Boostani, 2014). One study conducted by Baker et al (2010) found that greater social support and co-parenting while incarcerated was associated with more positive parenting post-release.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These legal instruments referenced a broad range of subject matter including human rights, alternatives to incarceration, avoiding the separation of mother and child, gender-responsiveness, prenatal and post-partum care, rights of children, and public health (e.g., HIV). The most commonly cited instrument relevant to children in a prison setting were the UNCRC 25 , 46 , 51 , 57 , 62 while for women and children, the most commonly cited instrument was the Bangkok Rules. 39 , 40 , 47 , 57 , 63 Both instruments stress that the individual rights of the child are separate from the rights of their mother and advocate from the perspective of the child.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Target Policy focus Cited convention, policy, legislation, instrument OECD non-OECD Child Children in corrections facilities 25 , 35 , 40 , 46 , 51 , 56 , 57 , 60 , 61 Bangkok Rules' -The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No 108 of 1996 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa [CRSA], 1996) -Correctional Services Amendment Act No 25 of 2008 (CSA, 2008). -United Nations General Assembly, 1989 (UN) -Zambian Constitution of 2005–section 20 of the Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998 -Finnish legislation 4 5 Best interest principle of the child 46 , 51 , 56 , 57 , 60 , 61 -Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia -United Nations Rules for the treatment of women prisoners and offenders (the ‘Bangkok Rules’) -Australia's federal Family Law Act 1975 Correctional Services Act on 1 October 2008 -United Nations' convention on the rights of the child (UNCRC) -Finnish legislation -Child Welfare Act 4 2 Rights of the child 25 , 35 , 46 , 51 , 57 -UNCRC 2 3 Access to health services 35 -National legislation–associated with new international legislation (UN, 2010) -Performance of women's social movements (BRASIL, 2008) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations