2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10751-017-1457-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mössbauer spectroscopy under acoustical excitation: thick target effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another well-known manifestation of the Doppler effect is the periodic modulation of the quantum transition frequencies of nuclei in the case of acoustic vibration of the absorber. If the vibration frequency exceeds the transition linewidth, such a modulation leads to splitting of a recoilless absorption single line into a comb of equidistant well-resolved spectral components separated by the vibration frequency (see 19 24 and references therein). The basic consequence of this multi-frequency nuclear response is the appearance of sidebands in the spectrum of the transmitted field, accompanied by a decrease in the absorption of radiation at the nuclear resonance and an increase in the integral transmittance of the absorber 19 , 25 – 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another well-known manifestation of the Doppler effect is the periodic modulation of the quantum transition frequencies of nuclei in the case of acoustic vibration of the absorber. If the vibration frequency exceeds the transition linewidth, such a modulation leads to splitting of a recoilless absorption single line into a comb of equidistant well-resolved spectral components separated by the vibration frequency (see 19 24 and references therein). The basic consequence of this multi-frequency nuclear response is the appearance of sidebands in the spectrum of the transmitted field, accompanied by a decrease in the absorption of radiation at the nuclear resonance and an increase in the integral transmittance of the absorber 19 , 25 – 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4.5-fold suppression of 14.4-keV collective coherent emission from two 57 Fe layers imbedded into a specifically designed planar waveguide was reported in [11]. It was observed that acoustic vibration of nuclear absorber leads to appearance of sidebands in the Mossbauer absorption spectra corresponding to a decrease in its resonant opacity [24,25]. In the case of piston-like absorber vibration (synchronous nuclear oscillations), the efficient resonant transformation of the incident quasi-monochromatic radiation into sidebands greatly enhanced its transmittance to 70% demonstrated in [12] and over 80% observed in [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the common tools for controlling quantum optical interfaces, such as intense spectrally narrow coherent sources and highfinesse cavities are still unavailable in hard x-ray/-ray range, preventing from a direct realization of the basic optical transparency techniques such as EIT and ATS-transparency, for high-energy photons. Several different techniques to control resonant interaction between hard x-ray/-ray photons and nuclear ensembles were developed, based on variation of hyperfine or external magnetic field [10,17,18], mechanical displacement (periodic or non-periodic) of an absorber or source with respect to each other including acoustic vibration [12,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and placing nuclei into a spatial sandwich-like nano-structure [11]. The 25% reduction in absorption of 14.4-keV photons was observed via anti-crossing of the upper energy sublevels of 57 Fe nuclei in a crystal of FeCO 3 taking place at 30 K [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%