2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mössbauer spectroscopic evaluation of chemical and electronic distributions in La(Fe0.81Si0.19)13

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table summarizes the parameters fitted to the Mössbauer spectra at different temperatures. The parameters of each phase are in general agreement with literature data. ,, For example, the hyperfine field of the Si-poor phase at 180 K is close to that reported for LaFe 11.7 Si 1.3 at 184 K (24.5 vs 23.5 T) and the hyperfine field of the Si-rich phase at 200 K falls between those reported for LaFe 11.6 Si 1.6 and LaFe 11.4 Si 2.0 . Here, attention is focused on the parameters of the Si-rich and the Si-poor phase at 180 K and lower temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table summarizes the parameters fitted to the Mössbauer spectra at different temperatures. The parameters of each phase are in general agreement with literature data. ,, For example, the hyperfine field of the Si-poor phase at 180 K is close to that reported for LaFe 11.7 Si 1.3 at 184 K (24.5 vs 23.5 T) and the hyperfine field of the Si-rich phase at 200 K falls between those reported for LaFe 11.6 Si 1.6 and LaFe 11.4 Si 2.0 . Here, attention is focused on the parameters of the Si-rich and the Si-poor phase at 180 K and lower temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, the hyperfine field of the Si-poor phase is about 10% larger. These differences suggest that Fe atoms have different valence states in the two phases . The quadrupole splitting and the line width of the Si-poor phase are larger than those of the Si-rich phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From a neutron diffraction experiment, Wang et al [22] concluded that Si is randomly distributed between the 8b and the 96i sites. A very different conclusion was drawn from the analysis of 57 Fe Mö ssbauer spectra [23]: the Si atoms occupy the 96i sites only. The latter result is in agreement with an earlier neutron study of an isomorphous compound LaFe 13Àx Al x [24], where the same strong preference of Al for the 96i sites was found.…”
Section: -Type Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[4,17,21,[62][63][64] La(Fe x Si 1Àx ) 13 crystallizes in ar ather complex cubic NaZn 13 (Fm3 m) structure with 112 atoms in the unit cell and two inequivalent Fe sites.F e I resides on 8b sites,l ocatedi nt he center of icosahedral cages formed by Fe II on the 96i sites. These sites are shared with Si, which is required to stabilize the structure.L ai sp ositioned on the 8a sites [65][66][67] as depicted in Figure2.F or the composition LaFe 11.6 Si 1.4 ,w hich we used for our experiments,the magnetostructural transition was observed to be approximately T t % 190 K. In our samples we observed an arrow,b ut noticeable thermal hysteresis of 3K. [25,35] Thet ransition from the ferromagnetic (FM) to the paramagnetic (PM) phase is accompanied by as ignificant volume decreaseo f% 1%, [68] but the lattice symmetry remains the same.T his leads to interface and volumetric stress during the transition, whichi sapotential cause of hysteresis.…”
Section: Disentangling the Microscopic Contributions To The Entropy Cmentioning
confidence: 99%