2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mosquitoes LTR Retrotransposons: A Deeper View into the Genomic Sequence of Culex quinquefasciatus

Abstract: A set of 67 novel LTR-retrotransposon has been identified by in silico analyses of the Culex quinquefasciatus genome using the LTR_STRUC program. The phylogenetic analysis shows that 29 novel and putatively functional LTR-retrotransposons detected belong to the Ty3/gypsy group. Our results demonstrate that, by considering only families containing potentially autonomous LTR-retrotransposons, they account for about 1% of the genome of C. quinquefasciatus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…aegypti ), the principal vector of yellow fever, and Culex quinquefasciatus ( Cu. quinquefasciatus ), the main vector of the nematode Wuchereria bancrofti have a high repeat content (about 55% and about 60%, respectively) and are relatively rich in transposable element [ 34 37 ], whereas Ch. tentans has very few transposable elements (Additional file 1 : Table S3 and Table S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aegypti ), the principal vector of yellow fever, and Culex quinquefasciatus ( Cu. quinquefasciatus ), the main vector of the nematode Wuchereria bancrofti have a high repeat content (about 55% and about 60%, respectively) and are relatively rich in transposable element [ 34 37 ], whereas Ch. tentans has very few transposable elements (Additional file 1 : Table S3 and Table S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar noncoding, nonautonomous members of LTR‐retrotransposon families that rely on their intact cousins for mobility have been identified in plants and insects (Havecker, Gao, & Voytas, ; Marsano et al, ). They have been called large retrotransposon derivatives (LARDs; Kalendar et al, ) or terminal repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIMs; Witte, Le, Bureau, & Kumar, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Unusually for a minisatellite, the level of sequence homogenization among the repeat units within each chromosome is lower than the homogenization between the copies of the microsatellite array (and the whole LARD containing it) on different chromosomes. Similar minisatellite repeats are a feature of LARDs in the genome of the insect Culex quinquefasciatus (Marsano et al, ) and may perhaps play a role in the element's mobilization cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2002; Fernández-Medina et al 2011), Culex quinquefasciatus (Arensburguer et al 2010; Marsano et al 2012), Rhodnius prolixus (Mesquita et al 2015), and Tribolium castaneum (Wang et al 2008), among others; however, less is known about these elements at the transcription level (de Araujo et al 2005; Deloger et al 2009; Mourier and Willerslev 2010; Iorizzo et al 2011; Jiang et al 2012; Sze et al 2012). TEs are not only relevant due to the bulk of the genome occupied by them, but also due to the impact they have at the transcription level, by inserting into coding or regulatory regions, by influencing alternative mRNA processing or as sources of small regulatory RNAs (Kines and Belancio 2012; Mourier and Willerslev 2010; Cowley and Oakey 2013; de Araujo et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%