2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74183-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOSES: A Platform for Experimenting with QoS-Driven Self-Adaptation Policies for Service Oriented Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main challenges found in the studies analyzed related to the design of frameworks for Self‐Apps are identified and discussed in this section. In terms of Self‐Apps, the fact that these applications have become emergent rather than traditional ones, since the need of adaptation at runtime is considered the primary challenge, initially impacting the complexity of developing these applications and tools, as well as the approaches and frameworks used to develop them 12,13,21 . Such a process becomes even more complex when a semantic standard is not adopted in an environment that is constantly changing, as we identified in our discussion of quality attributes.…”
Section: S‐frame: a Modular Framework To Design Self‐appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main challenges found in the studies analyzed related to the design of frameworks for Self‐Apps are identified and discussed in this section. In terms of Self‐Apps, the fact that these applications have become emergent rather than traditional ones, since the need of adaptation at runtime is considered the primary challenge, initially impacting the complexity of developing these applications and tools, as well as the approaches and frameworks used to develop them 12,13,21 . Such a process becomes even more complex when a semantic standard is not adopted in an environment that is constantly changing, as we identified in our discussion of quality attributes.…”
Section: S‐frame: a Modular Framework To Design Self‐appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of Self‐Apps can be considered a nontrivial, costly, and error‐prone activity when performed manually. In this sense, some initiatives found in the literature 12‐16 have revealed that the use of frameworks are considered a feasible alternative to support the development of these applications. These initiatives have emerged from a variety of research communities, and address specific issues in the context of Self‐Apps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore studied Service oriented Architecture (SoA) adaptation solutions reviewed in (Mutanu and Kotonya, 2018). These solutions commonly include network QoS parameters in the criteria for selecting the optimal service location (Cardellini et al, 2017) (Aschoff and Zisman, 2011). These solutions use different strategies for adapting the composition, which try to avoid Service Level Agreement (SLA) violations, either by predicting such problems or reacting to detected violations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the OSGi service can provide ubiquitous connectivity to distributed devices, it requires Java virtual machines which cannot be deployed on IoT devices because of their limited resources. Service‐oriented self‐adaptation framework based on imperative technologies such as business process execution language (BPEL) has also been proposed [35]. However, declarative approaches are not appropriate when IoT applications because they lack maintainability and scalability.…”
Section: Related Work and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%