2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-006-0031-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moser–Trudinger inequalities of vector bundle over a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension 2

Abstract: Abstract. Let (M, g) be a 2-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold. In this paper, we use the method of blowing up analysis to prove several Moser-Trdinger type inequalities for vector bundle over (M, g). We also derive an upper bound of such inequalities under the assumption that blowing up occur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.5 with a k = 0 and f k = 1. However, in Li (2001Li ( , 2005, we proved the blow up (i.e. c k → +∞) will never happen, while in this paper, we need the function sequence u k to blow up and to concentrate at p. For this sake, we will chose suitable a k so that the blow up happen, and suitable f k so that |∇ g u k | n dV g δ p .…”
Section: Theorem 13 Let (Mg) Be a Compact Riemannian Manifold Withomentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1.5 with a k = 0 and f k = 1. However, in Li (2001Li ( , 2005, we proved the blow up (i.e. c k → +∞) will never happen, while in this paper, we need the function sequence u k to blow up and to concentrate at p. For this sake, we will chose suitable a k so that the blow up happen, and suitable f k so that |∇ g u k | n dV g δ p .…”
Section: Theorem 13 Let (Mg) Be a Compact Riemannian Manifold Withomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We mainly follows the ideas in Li 2001Li , 2005 in which we considered Eq. 1.5 with a k = 0 and f k = 1.…”
Section: Theorem 13 Let (Mg) Be a Compact Riemannian Manifold Withomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of extremals in the TM-inequality was obtained by Carleson and Chang [10] for Ω = B 1 (0) ⊂ R 2 , by Flucher [23] for arbitrary bounded domains in R 2 , and by Lin [33] for bounded domains in R N ; de Figueiredo et al [19] gave an alternative proof and some generalization, using an optimal normalized concentrating sequence. For extensions of the TM-inequality to manifolds, see Cherrier [12], Fontana [25], Li [31,32], Yang [44]. Related elliptic equations with "critical" TM growth were considered by Adimurthi [3] and de Figueiredo et al [18], giving sufficient conditions on the lower order terms for the existence of solutions; in de Figueiredo and Ruf [21] the non-existence of radial solutions was proved for equations with critical TM-growth whose lower order term does not satisfy the above existence conditions.…”
Section: The Trudinger-moser Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to section 2 in [20], for a constant δ ∈ (0, µ(∂M)) we define Proof. The proof will be accomplished through the following four steps.…”
Section: The Best Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%