2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although social and economic transitions had different rhythms, for CEE cities urban evolution followed quite the same cyclic phenomena related with the Western European cities (Antrop 2004;Stanilov 2007). Since 1990, every CEE Capital cityincluding Moscow (Russian Federation) -followed almost the same way of reformation through urban policy (Rudolph and Brade 2005). The difference is the effect in landscape change and its temporal resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although social and economic transitions had different rhythms, for CEE cities urban evolution followed quite the same cyclic phenomena related with the Western European cities (Antrop 2004;Stanilov 2007). Since 1990, every CEE Capital cityincluding Moscow (Russian Federation) -followed almost the same way of reformation through urban policy (Rudolph and Brade 2005). The difference is the effect in landscape change and its temporal resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notable in this regard is a strengthening of processes of social polarisation that have become visible at the periphery. Perhaps as a corollary to this, as they argue, is that the economics of transition have become less powerful as a defining force in peripheral urbanisation and that "Rather, universal economic mechanisms and strategies with global effects are starting to shape the Moscow periphery" [Rudolph and Brade, 2005:148]. What we have described above tends to question the diminishing importance of transition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The ambiguous position of suburban and satellite settlements remains and has often been amplified in the post-Soviet era. Rudolph and Brade (2005), while making it clear that contemporary urbanisation at the periphery of Moscow can be described as a new phase, suggest that development at the periphery displays hybrid elements [Rudolph and Brade, 2005: 148]. Notable in this regard is a strengthening of processes of social polarisation that have become visible at the periphery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social memory may well be a result of intentional memory politics: architects and city planners not infrequently set out to accentuate a particular construction of a city's history, by emphasizing certain historical elements and destroying others [29]. Changes in the urban space, especially the capitals, allows tracing ideas and revising values [6,12,13,16,21,23,25,27].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moscow was not only the place where political, administrative and economic power was located; it was also a model of civilization for the whole country. [23] During the 20th century, Moscow changed from being a one million-person city in Russia to the largest European urban agglomeration. The growth and urbanization processes were particularly strong during the Soviet period.…”
Section: Argument Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%