2021
DOI: 10.2172/1841593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOSCATO Solver Development and Integration Plan

Abstract: The Laboratory's main facility is outside Chicago, at 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439. For information about Argonne and its pioneering science and technology programs, see www.anl.gov. DOCUMENT AVAILABILITYOnline Access: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free at OSTI.GOV (http://www.osti.gov/), a service of the US Dept. of Energy's Office of Scientific and Technical Information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Samples 6-17, 7-10, and 14-63FV were not included in the comparison analysis below. The details of the power history leading up to the first sample (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) were difficult to ascertain from MSRP reports [10,11] and it was not possible to obtain a cumulative MWhr amount that was within 10% of the reported value. Finally, ADDER burn steps that would correspond to Samples 7-10 and 14-63FV (dated 7/6/66 and 2/27/68, respectively) were accidentally excluded during the run.…”
Section: Comparison To Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, Samples 6-17, 7-10, and 14-63FV were not included in the comparison analysis below. The details of the power history leading up to the first sample (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) were difficult to ascertain from MSRP reports [10,11] and it was not possible to obtain a cumulative MWhr amount that was within 10% of the reported value. Finally, ADDER burn steps that would correspond to Samples 7-10 and 14-63FV (dated 7/6/66 and 2/27/68, respectively) were accidentally excluded during the run.…”
Section: Comparison To Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, no corrosion products are added to the salt in this fuel depletion simulation as this needs to be estimated separately from a dedicated corrosion modeling tool such as MOSCATO [15,16]. As an example, during two major periods of experimental runs of the MSRE, the average fuel salt composition was measured to have roughly around 72 ± 14 ppm Cr, 144 ± 44 ppm Fe, and 57 ± 40 ppm Ni [4].…”
Section: Impact Of Fuel Salt Composition Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the NEAMS Structural Materials & Chemistry technical area, development has been ongoing for MOSCATO [52,53], which simulates the behavior of electrochemically active solutes in both the salt and alloy at CFD-scale velocity and thermal gradients in the flowing salt. This is based on a Poisson-Nerst-Plank (PNP) model implemented into Nek5000, and soon NekRS as well.…”
Section: Moscato and Pronghorn-pnpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the computational demands of CFD tools such as MOSCATO, modeling corrosion of very large geometries/systems and long timescales is not the ideal use-case. The code has been demonstrated for [52,53] and is being validated against experimental data from operated TCLs at relatively short timescales. This is useful in investigating the corrosion behavior of certain solutes, salt systems, and alloys, for unique or complex geometries and thermal flow fields.…”
Section: Moscato and Pronghorn-pnpmentioning
confidence: 99%