1984
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.21.3.228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mosaic hexasomy 21.

Abstract: SUMMARY Cases in which there are more than three copies of a sex chromosome, and rarely of an autosome, have been reported, but to our knowledge hexasomy has never been described except in tissue undergoing neoplastic change. This report describes a female infant with multiple malformations in whom we found a mosaic hexasomy 21. This was first detected in amniotic fluid cells and subsequently in skin fibroblasts.Case report Spontaneous delivery of this female infant occurred at about 36 weeks' gestation. Birth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, the mitotic nondisjunction occurs between the first cleavage division and early embryonal stage. The case misinterpreted as hexasomy 21 mosaicism (Ketupanya et al, 1984) and ours may be the extreme examples concerning the time of mosaic formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Perhaps, the mitotic nondisjunction occurs between the first cleavage division and early embryonal stage. The case misinterpreted as hexasomy 21 mosaicism (Ketupanya et al, 1984) and ours may be the extreme examples concerning the time of mosaic formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Moreover, four other patients have been reported but were confused with mosaic tetrasomy 12p due to use of banding techniques alone (Gilgenkrantz et al, 1987;Hall, 1985;Nagarsheth & Mootabar, 1997). This may also be the case of a little girl who died shortly after birth in a context of severe malformations without Down syndrome phenotype and in whom a weak mosaic of a hexasomy 21 (with two supernumerary marker chromosomes supposed to be a double 21;21 translocation) on amniotic fluid and skin but not on blood was demonstrated (Ketupånyå, Crandåll, Blanchard, & Rogers, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%