Mississippian Mortuary Practices 2010
DOI: 10.5744/florida/9780813034263.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortuary Practices and Cultural Identity at the Turn of the Sixteenth Century in Eastern Tennessee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the community was corporately structured, or community‐based, not hierarchical. This may indicate that the community of Holliston Mills possessed cultural practices and lifestyles distinct from other late Mississippian communities in the region (Franklin et al, ), which is consistent with the diversity of Dallas phase cultural identities (Sullivan & Harle, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that the community was corporately structured, or community‐based, not hierarchical. This may indicate that the community of Holliston Mills possessed cultural practices and lifestyles distinct from other late Mississippian communities in the region (Franklin et al, ), which is consistent with the diversity of Dallas phase cultural identities (Sullivan & Harle, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Toqua is a Dallas site with evidence of fluid social roles and horizontal power relationships highly similar to Holliston Mills. Ethnohistoric evidence from the Cherokee, which are the most relevant ethnographic analogues for Dallas societies (see Lloyd, ; Sullivan & Harle, ), suggests that women engaged in generalized foraging, domestic (e.g., pottery production), and agricultural labor throughout the year, with participation in field labor stretching from young to old ages. Men engaged mainly in specialized, seasonal agricultural and hunting and fishing labour (see Lloyd, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corpse disposal included primary inhumation (in flexed, semi-flexed and extended positions) within plazas, in mounds, in stone box graves, or under house floors, as well as the use of charnel houses, typically with corpse defleshing and then secondary bundle burial within accretional mounds (Boyd and Boyd 1991;Dunham et al 2003;Gold 2000Gold , 2004Johnson et al 1994;Reeves 2000, pp. 81-82;Speck 1939;Stojanowski 2010, p. 118;Sullivan and Harle 2010). In short, no known Native American burial tradition included a grave form similar to or including the secondary shaft typifying the traditional vaulted burial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is also reason to suspect that Dallas phase communities varied intraregionally between primarily ascribed or achieved status (e.g. Betsinger, ; Chapman, ; Sullivan & Harle, ; Vogel, ). Hence, the Dallas phase sample should be compared with and without the mound‐interred component.…”
Section: Materials Methods and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%