2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1456593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortgage Indebtedness and Household Financial Distress

Abstract: 4Non-technical summary 5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are those reported and discussed in many other studies on this topic (Duygan-Bump and Grant, 2009;Georgarakos et al, 2009;European Commission, 2008). Nevertheless, they derive from very different situations.…”
Section: Data and Definitionssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These data are those reported and discussed in many other studies on this topic (Duygan-Bump and Grant, 2009;Georgarakos et al, 2009;European Commission, 2008). Nevertheless, they derive from very different situations.…”
Section: Data and Definitionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A specific contribution of this paper to the analysis of the probability of delinquency is that we focus on the percentage of households with mortgages who are late in making payments, while other studies tend to emphasize the frequency of delinquent households in relation to the total population (European Commission, 2008;Duygan-Bump and Grant, 2009;Georgarakos et al, 2009). An interesting result of our analysis is that in Italy roughly 5% of households with mortgages were delinquent in 2007, the highest value, together with Spain, among the seven European countries under analysis; similar results are found for the other waves, i.e., 2005 and 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, the estimates remain within the 95 per cent confidence interval from the OLS regressions (not shown, but available in a web appendix). 20 Moreover, we find that most of the variation in the effect of household characteristics across the debt distri- 20 However, there are some exceptions. Notably, in a number of countries the age effects vary along the debt distribution, and on occasion the estimates move outside the OLS 95 per cent confidence interval bounds.…”
Section: The Amount Of Debt Heldmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Regarding the amount of secured debt held, the impacts of time to repossess vary substantially across cohort/age groups.Conditional on obtaining a secured loan, a 15 months longer repossession period decreases by 12 per cent the amount of debt held by the set of households aged [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and with characteristics other than age held at those of the reference group. 41 .…”
Section: Economic Magnitude Of the Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to such authors, the number of household members is shown to positively affect LTV. Moreover, according to Georgarakos, Lojschova and Ward-Warmedinger [20], households may have not fully taken into account the costs associated with children before deciding to borrow and thus children show up as an additional source of distress when servicing mortgage debt.…”
Section: Profiles Building and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%