2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortar based frictional contact formulation for higher order interpolations using the moving friction cone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
101
1
31

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
101
1
31
Order By: Relevance
“…But even if all slave elements are fully covered by the master surface, an integration based on a segmentation process as illustrated in [36,54,55] is more accurate than an element based integration usually performed on slave elements [41,56], see also [57] for a comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Recently, element based integration for isogeometric mortar methods has been analyzed in [58], where also an alternative non-symmetric integration rule for the mortar integrals is used to reduce the integration error.…”
Section: Accurate Contact Integration For Igamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even if all slave elements are fully covered by the master surface, an integration based on a segmentation process as illustrated in [36,54,55] is more accurate than an element based integration usually performed on slave elements [41,56], see also [57] for a comparison in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Recently, element based integration for isogeometric mortar methods has been analyzed in [58], where also an alternative non-symmetric integration rule for the mortar integrals is used to reduce the integration error.…”
Section: Accurate Contact Integration For Igamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, all mortar integrals are evaluated through integration on the slave surface NURBS elements by evaluating the contact variables at the closest point projection of the integration point to the master surface. The order of integration is chosen to be sufficiently high in order to minimize the error in the evaluation of the integrals, following Fischer and Wriggers [13,14].…”
Section: Mortar-based Finite Element Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact evaluation of the contact surface integrals would need a segmentation of the surface, as proposed for the mortar method in [56,40,39]. Instead of looking for exact integration, in this work we use the same strategy proposed in [18,50,22] and depicted in Figure 4. The approximate integration is performed evaluating the integrand at the quadrature points defined on the surface Γ (1) C regardless of whether the integrand belongs to one or other body.…”
Section: Lagrange Multiplier Interpolation: Penalty Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider both standard finite elements and the so called immersed boundary elements in which an underlying Cartesian grid made of regular hexahedral elements is cut by the real geometry and integration is performed only in the internal part of the elements. In recent years segment-to-segment formulations like the mortar method [8] have been successfully applied to solving a wide variety of contact problems in 2D [35,27,55] and 3D [39,38], with linear and quadratic elements [28,53], in large and small deformations including Coulomb friction [40,41,17,18,42,50,20] and dynamic problems [24]. The theoretical basis of the mortar method is well known [15,28,32,30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%