1990
DOI: 10.2307/1937596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality Risk vs. Food Quality Trade‐Offs in a Common Currency: Ant Patch Preferences

Abstract: Many studies have shown that predation risk affects foraging behavior, but quantitative predictions are rare because of the lack of a common currency for energy intake and mortality. This problem is soluble in ants. We gave 12 Lasius pallitarsis colonies the choice between foraging in two patches that differed both in food quality and in associated mortality risk. We independently measured the growth that colonies could achieve on the diets offered in those patches. With no risk at either patch, colonies alway… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
137
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ants could, however, react to absolute difference in nutrient concentrations or to the growth consequences each diet level has for the colony. The former is not a significant predictor o f patch choice (Nonacs, 1988), but in L.pu/litursis the willingness of foragers to use risky patches is correlated closely with gain in terms of colony growth (Nonacs & Dill, 1990). The growth consequences of the different patches are unknown for M.incompletu and may not be the same as for L.pullitar.sis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ants could, however, react to absolute difference in nutrient concentrations or to the growth consequences each diet level has for the colony. The former is not a significant predictor o f patch choice (Nonacs, 1988), but in L.pu/litursis the willingness of foragers to use risky patches is correlated closely with gain in terms of colony growth (Nonacs & Dill, 1990). The growth consequences of the different patches are unknown for M.incompletu and may not be the same as for L.pullitar.sis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when colonies are given access to two patches, in a situation where the patch with the higher food quality has an associated mortality risk, the ants make behavioural trade-offs, These trade-offs appear to be based on the consequences for colony growth. Foragers value risky and safe patches equally when the extra colony growth to be gained from the risky patch approximately offsets the forager mortality rate (Nonacs & Dill, 1990). Finally, successful L.pallitursis foragers appear to be able to communicate the presence of danger along the trail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Empirical studies of social insects show that colony size affects the allocation of workers to various tasks (Tschinkel, 1988;Nonacs and Dill, 1990;Wolf and Schmid-Hempel, 1990). In harvester ants, task allocation in larger colonies is more stable and consistent when environmental conditions change in comparison with smaller colonies (Gordon, 1987).…”
Section: -7653mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babbler fledglings seem to show flexibility in their risk-taking, moving to riskier locations when they are hungry but staying in the cover and relative safety of trees when they are satiated. Other species have also been shown to be flexible in their risk-taking, for example, colonies of the ant Lasius pallitarsis are willing to forage in high-risk food patches when the pay-offs are higher than those in low-risk patches [41]. As moving to the ground is costlier in terms of predation risk than remaining in the trees, rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc R Soc B 280: 20130558…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%