2017
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality risk prediction in infective endocarditis surgery: reliability analysis of specific scores†

Abstract: Specific risk scores had better prognostic performance than classical risk scores. The STS-IE score had the highest discrimination and was adequately calibrated. The PALSUSE score also showed optimal discrimination and calibration. The De Feo-Cotrufo score had a lower discrimination in our sample; however, the De Feo-Cotrufo score is recommended in the current guidelines. The Costa score had the lowest discrimination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The line between a correct indication for surgery and operative futility often can be arbitrary. There are a significant number of scores used to estimate the surgical risk in patients with IE, 13‐16 but their reliability has been questioned 17,18 . In our practice, a high estimated mortality risk using these scores has never been used to judge on operability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line between a correct indication for surgery and operative futility often can be arbitrary. There are a significant number of scores used to estimate the surgical risk in patients with IE, 13‐16 but their reliability has been questioned 17,18 . In our practice, a high estimated mortality risk using these scores has never been used to judge on operability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, multiple prior studies have developed calculators for risk stratification in IE 13,14 . An evaluation of these various risk scores found one that was developed using national STS data to be the most predictive with a c‐index of 0.76 15 . This particular risk index was derived in a study of over 19 000 patients with IE in the STS database which identified risk factors for 30‐day mortality, including operative urgency, cardiogenic shock, preoperative renal failure, diabetes, prior cardiac surgery, chronic lung disease, and multiple valve involvement 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 An evaluation of these various risk scores found one that was developed using national STS data to be the most predictive with a c-index of 0.76. 15 This particular risk index was derived in a study of over 19 000 patients with IE in the STS database which identified risk factors for 30-day mortality, including operative urgency, cardiogenic shock, preoperative renal failure, diabetes, prior cardiac surgery, chronic lung disease, and multiple valve involvement. 16 Although their study was designed to identify risk factors for 30-day mortality, many of the risk factors in their score were also identified in our study as predictors of longitudinal mortality risk.…”
Section: Overallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a new study, the origin of the IE episode could be attributed to diagnostic procedures in 10.52% of the cases, to intercurrent infectious processes in 42.11% of the cases, to other surgical procedures in 26.3% of the cases, and to unknown causes in 21.05% of the cases, with the need for surgical treatment in all the cases (29) . The fact that an IE is produced due to any of the aforementioned causes generates a considerable increase in the risk of the bacterial layer settling on the prosthetic materials, or of residual injuries and frequently on right cavities (30) , which becomes a serious form of the disease with high global mortality (29) . Nevertheless, these researchers did not determine the source of the bacteremia, nor did they establish the elements or components of the possible infection focuses, which is necessary to establish a clinical suspicion prior to providing an early diagnosis and treatment to the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%