2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-002-1181-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality Registration in Patients with a Proximal Femoral Fracture Admitted to a Surgical Ward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such questions can only be answered with a high autopsy rate and a multidisciplinary review where all patients who died are systematically evaluated and categorized according to a standard protocol. In our institution, such a protocol, a mortality registration, was started in 1991 and the results of the use of this protocol have been reported for patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery [8]and proximal femur fractures [9]. These studies demonstrated a discrepancy between autopsy findings and clinical findings in 30% after central vascular surgery and a discrepancy of 7% after proximal femur surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such questions can only be answered with a high autopsy rate and a multidisciplinary review where all patients who died are systematically evaluated and categorized according to a standard protocol. In our institution, such a protocol, a mortality registration, was started in 1991 and the results of the use of this protocol have been reported for patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery [8]and proximal femur fractures [9]. These studies demonstrated a discrepancy between autopsy findings and clinical findings in 30% after central vascular surgery and a discrepancy of 7% after proximal femur surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%