2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1284-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality rates and prognostic factors in patients with malignant salivary tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Univariate analysis suggested that cT4 stage, cN+ stage, stage IV disease, and facial nerve invasion were prognostic factors for parotid carcinoma. In terms of histological grade, in the first half of this study, the 5-year DSS rates for low-/intermediate-grade patients and high-grade patients were 94.4% and 34.3%, respectively, which were significantly different ( p = 0.026), similar to those in other reports [ 23 , 33 ]. Although postoperative radiotherapy is effective in preventing local and cervical lymph node recurrences in patients with a poor prognosis, distant metastasis may ultimately determine the prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Univariate analysis suggested that cT4 stage, cN+ stage, stage IV disease, and facial nerve invasion were prognostic factors for parotid carcinoma. In terms of histological grade, in the first half of this study, the 5-year DSS rates for low-/intermediate-grade patients and high-grade patients were 94.4% and 34.3%, respectively, which were significantly different ( p = 0.026), similar to those in other reports [ 23 , 33 ]. Although postoperative radiotherapy is effective in preventing local and cervical lymph node recurrences in patients with a poor prognosis, distant metastasis may ultimately determine the prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some reports have suggested that prophylactic neck dissection should be considered in high-grade and T4 cases because of the high rate of occult lymph node metastasis [ 22 ]. Other studies have indicated that prophylactic neck dissection in cN0 cases does not improve survival and that the benefit of prophylactic neck dissection is limited in terms of prolonging survival [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In this study, only 1 of 5 cN0 patients had occult cervical lymph node metastasis in Group A, and 3 of the 36 cN0 patients showed late-onset cervical lymph node metastases in Group B, which were successfully managed by salvage neck dissection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of appropriate treatment has a direct impact on patient prognosis, but it is not the only prognostic factor. Findings indicate clinical factors such as histopathological type and grade of lesion, advanced tumor stage, facial nerve involvement, vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis, negatively affect prognosis [ 14 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In addition, demographic factors such as gender or age are also factors that affect prognosis [ 14 , 26 , 31 , 34 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%