1989
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-198907000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality Patterns among Workers Exposed to Acrylamide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
77
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These investigators found that the acrylonitrile exposure-response relationship for lung cancer that had been suggested in the original Lima cohort study (Marsh et al [12]) was likely to be positively confounded by smoking. In the original NCI study (Blair et al [2]), the Lima, OH (Marsh and Zimmerman [7]) study, and another study of acrylonitrile workers (Collins et al [6]), the prevalence of smoking was found to increase with increasing acrylonitrile exposure, thus creating the potential for positive confounding of any association between acrylonitrile exposure and lung cancer mortality. Furthermore, in a reanalysis of the original NCI nested case-cohort study of lung cancer (Blair et al [2]) that addressed missing and misclassified smoking data, Cunningham and Marsh 1 found still further evidence that lung cancer risk estimates reported in the original full NCI study were positively confounded by smoking.…”
Section: Issue 6 -Do Alternative Metrics Lead To Results Consistent Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These investigators found that the acrylonitrile exposure-response relationship for lung cancer that had been suggested in the original Lima cohort study (Marsh et al [12]) was likely to be positively confounded by smoking. In the original NCI study (Blair et al [2]), the Lima, OH (Marsh and Zimmerman [7]) study, and another study of acrylonitrile workers (Collins et al [6]), the prevalence of smoking was found to increase with increasing acrylonitrile exposure, thus creating the potential for positive confounding of any association between acrylonitrile exposure and lung cancer mortality. Furthermore, in a reanalysis of the original NCI nested case-cohort study of lung cancer (Blair et al [2]) that addressed missing and misclassified smoking data, Cunningham and Marsh 1 found still further evidence that lung cancer risk estimates reported in the original full NCI study were positively confounded by smoking.…”
Section: Issue 6 -Do Alternative Metrics Lead To Results Consistent Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial evidence that lung cancer mortality is not associated with acrylonitrile exposure has been obtained from four large acrylonitrile worker cohort studies: NCI (Blair et al [2]), DuPont (Symons et al [3]), Dutch (Swaen et al [4]), and United Kingdom (Benn and Osborne [5]), as well as from independent studies of subcohorts of workers from two of the NCI study sites in Fortier, LA/Santa Rosa, FL (Collins et al [6]) and Lima, OH (Marsh and Zimmerman [7]). Nevertheless, in 2014, Kopylev [1] speculated that a significant positive association may have been missed in the Blair et al [2] analysis because the NCI investigators did not employ the "correct" metric for acrylonitrile exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other studies have been retrospective, descriptive, observational studies; standardized mortality rate (SMR) studies comparing observed to expected death rates; or meta-analyses, which have simply lumped prior studies for analysis, including ones by the same authors (Table 5) [4][5][6][7][8]. The design of this study permitted the exact confirmation of professional lifetime occupations and underlying causes of death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most MMA carcinogenicity studies in humans have been combined retrospective cohort studies from the 1930s through the 1990s, or meta-analyses of the same and similar studies [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In addition, most of the negative cancer studies were authored by epidemiologists employed by major chemical manufacturers of MMA in the USA (American Cyanamid Company, Wayne, NJ; Rohm and Hass Co., Croydon, PA) and in the UK (Imperial Chemical Industries; Lucite International UK Ltd.) [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large prospective study found no evidence that dietary intake of acrylamide is associated with cancers of the colon or rectum (Mucci et al, 2006). In addition, a study of some 9000 workers exposed to acrylamide between the years 1925 and 1976 found a statistically significant decrease in deaths from all causes (Collins et al, 1989). A follow-up study of these workers through year 1994 corroborated many of the initial findings (Marsh et al, 1999).…”
Section: Hormetic Acrylamidementioning
confidence: 96%