1991
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality of employees in plants manufacturing 4,4'-bipyridyl.

Abstract: PADDLE OM, OSBORN AJ, PARKER ODJ. Mortality of employees in plants manufacturing 4,4'-bipyridyl. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17:175-8. A historical-prospective cohort study was conducted of 729 male employees of plants manufacturing 4,4'-bipyridyl. The cohort was studied because employment in some of the plants had beenlinked to malignantand nonmalignant skin lesionsattributed to exposureto tarry by-products. The overallmortalityexperience of the cohort did not show any statistically significant findings.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lung cancer was also of interest because the initial investigation reported a modest excess (13 observed, 10.5 expected deaths) 7. However, there was no evidence of an excess of lung cancer in the update, especially when compared with local mortalities (SMR=73; 95% CI 49 to 105).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lung cancer was also of interest because the initial investigation reported a modest excess (13 observed, 10.5 expected deaths) 7. However, there was no evidence of an excess of lung cancer in the update, especially when compared with local mortalities (SMR=73; 95% CI 49 to 105).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cohort included all employees who had ever worked on any of these plants, and a further 217 male employees and 10 female employees were added to the cohort established by Paddle et al 7 in 1983 (729 male employees and 32 female employees). However, 20 male subjects included in the original cohort were excluded because they were found to be not exposed (8) or they had minimal identifying information including no date of birth (12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations