Climate change will be with us for decades, even with signiWcant reductions in emissions. Therefore, predictions made with respect to climate change impacts on coral reefs need to be highly defensible to ensure credibility over the timeframes this issue demands. If not, a Cassandra syndrome could be created whereby future more well-supported predictions of the fate of reefs are neither heard nor acted upon. Herein, popularising predictions based on essentially untested assumptions regarding reefs and their capacity to cope with future climate change is questioned. Some of these assumptions include that: all corals live close to their thermal limits, corals cannot adapt/acclimatize to rapid rates of change, physiological trade-oVs resulting from ocean acidiWcation will lead to reduced fecundity, and that climate-induced coral loss leads to widespread Wsheries collapse. We argue that, while there is a place for popularising worst-case scenarios, the coral reef crisis has been eVectively communicated and, though this communication should be sustained, eVorts should now focus on addressing critical knowledge gaps.