Mortality and morbidity among patients who undergo combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery Early and late results

Herlitz, Johan; Brandrup‐Wognsen, Gunnar; Caidahl, Kenneth; Haglid, Maria; Bw, Karlsson; Karlsson, Thomas; Albertsson, Per; Lindelöw, Björn

doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(97)00278-9

Cited by 27 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…5) Applying CABG at the same time with mitral valve surgery increases mortality and rehospitalization rates. 16) Advanced age, a low EF, the having of a preoperative rate left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD) >45 mm and ischemic MR are indicators of poor prognosis in mitral valve surgery. 10) In our study, the patients whose mean age was <60, mean EF >40% and LVESD <45 mm, those with ischemic MR or having undergone concomitant CABG were not included in the study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Following Mitral Valve Surgical Procedures in the 6-Months Follow-up: A Prospective Study

Kara

Aydın

et al. 2013

ATCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the health-related quality of life of the patients who underwent mitral valve repair (MvRp) and mitral valve replacement (MVR). Methods: Within the scope of this prospective study design, 56 patients who had mitral valve operation between the years of 2011-2012 were enrolled in the study. 24 (42.8%) of these patients had MVR while 32 (57.1%) of them had MvRp. The health-related quality of life was evaluated according to the Turkey norms of Short Form 36 Quality-Of-Life Measures (SF-36), which were filled in by the patients before and 6 months after the operation. Moreover, preoperative risk factors affecting the quality of life (age, gender, functional capacity, rhythm, hypertension, diabetes, applied surgical method and echocardiographic results) were investigated for all the patients (n = 56) by using independent sample t test analysis. Results: When the pre and postoperative changes were compared between the two groups, it was found out that there were no significant difference between the groups in terms of restraints on physical role functioning (PR), and the social role functioning values (SF) (respectively; p = 0.097, p = 0.105). However, in the comparison of pre-/postoperative changes between the groups, the changes in physical functioning (PF), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT) and restraints on emotional role functioning (RE) and mental health (MH) values were found out to be significantly superior in the MvRp group than in the MVR group (respectively; p <0.01, p <0.05, p <0.01, p <0.01, p <0.05 and p <0.01). It was also confirmed that female gender, atrial fibrillation (AFR), and MVR method negatively affected the physical and mental components (respectively; p = 0.033, p = 0.003, p = 0.015). Conclusion: Results of the SF-36 quality of life measures show that quality of life may be better in patients that have had MvRp. It should be considered that the planned surgical treatment method can affect the patient's quality of life, and this effect can indicate the success of the surgical treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Following Mitral Valve Surgical Procedures in the 6-Months Follow-up: A Prospective Study

Kara

Aydın

et al. 2013

ATCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They compared retrospectively 659 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization alone with 303 patients undergoing aortic valvular replacement and myocardial revascularization simultaneously, and they found a 30-day mortality of 4.6% and 5.9% in the 1 st and 2 nd groups, respectively. Likewise, Herlitz et al 12 showed that the simultaneous procedures were not associated with higher mortality and readmission rates in a 5-year follow-up.…”

Section: Management Of Mild Aortic Stenosis In Patients Undergoing Comentioning

confidence: 93%

Management of mild aortic stenosis in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery

Moreira

Manfroi

Werutsky

et al. 2001

Arq. Bras. Cardiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…60 Moreover, in selected patients with acute coronary syndrome, poor conduit or target vessel quality, significant left ventricular dysfunction, or previous sternotomy, the risk of a conventional "double procedure" can be prohibitively high, with mortality approaching 20%. [61][62][63] A hybrid approach simplifies the operation into 2 lower-risk procedures, with initial PCI performed selectively, usually to a culprit vessel, and serves to stabilize a patient before minimally invasive valve surgery. In this way, hybrid approaches have been shown to improve outcomes and to lower mortality in high-risk patients.…”

Section: Hybrid Valve Replacement/pcimentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Procedures Have Proven Clinical Utility and Are the Wave of the Future

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mortality and morbidity among patients who undergo combined valve and coronary artery bypass surgery Early and late results

Cited by 27 publications

References 9 publications

Comparison of the Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Following Mitral Valve Surgical Procedures in the 6-Months Follow-up: A Prospective Study

Comparison of the Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Following Mitral Valve Surgical Procedures in the 6-Months Follow-up: A Prospective Study

Management of mild aortic stenosis in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery

Hybrid Procedures Have Proven Clinical Utility and Are the Wave of the Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About