1996
DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199607000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality Among Personnel Who Worked at the Mayak Complex in the First Years of Its Operation

Abstract: Epidemiological studies revealed increased cancer mortality among persons who began working at the Mayak complex during the period 1948-1958. Estimation of cancer risk was carried out for the sites of cancer that showed increased mortality and dependence on dose of external gamma- or internal alpha-irradiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The leukemia rate in workers at the reprocessing plants peaked about 2 to 5 years after the peak exposure rates and is in agreement with that observed in Japanese atomic bomb survivors (19). The data also suggest that the leukemia excess relative risk is about 1.4 per Gy, which is approximately 3-fold less than that for the atomic bomb survivors (17).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leukemia rate in workers at the reprocessing plants peaked about 2 to 5 years after the peak exposure rates and is in agreement with that observed in Japanese atomic bomb survivors (19). The data also suggest that the leukemia excess relative risk is about 1.4 per Gy, which is approximately 3-fold less than that for the atomic bomb survivors (17).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Lung cancer mortality was elevated in the radiochemical plant workers and was even higher in workers at the plutonium production facility but not in the nuclear reactors where all exposures were primarily from external sources (Table 5) (19). Lung cancer mortality in workers at the nuclear plants does not appear elevated in exposed groups, some of whom averaged over 5 Sv (Table 6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Occupational exposure to external ionizing radiation is known to be associated with leukemia incidence and mortality [Ulrich, 1946;Seltser and Sartwell, 1965;Caldwell et al, 1980Caldwell et al, , 1983Smith and Douglas, 1986;Koshurnikova et al, 1996;Cragle et al, 1999]. A point estimate for the RR from the BEIR V report for an exposure greater than 100 mSv (millisievert) is 1.57, with a 95% CI of 1.18-2.88.…”
Section: Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, the relatively few exposures to plutonium have resulted in small intakes of plutonium that have not allowed reliable estimation of risks (Guilmette et al 1987;Muggenburg et al 1997). However, definitive evidence of adverse health effects from large internal depositions of 239 Pu has been seen in Russian nuclear workers at the Mayak Production Association (MPA) (Koshurnikova et al 1996(Koshurnikova et al , 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPA worker cohort is a unique source of data on high exposures to plutonium in humans and has allowed direct quantification of the plutonium dose-response functions for lung, liver and bone cancer and the proportion of cancer risk attributable to internal plutonium alpha-particle exposure (Gilbert et al 2004;Koshurnikova et al 1999;Kreisheimer et al 2000;Sokolnikov et al 2008). Epidemiologic studies have shown the risk of cancer incidence and mortality among MPA workers to be significantly related to both external and internal dose (Gilbert et al 2000(Gilbert et al , 2004Koshurnikova et al 1996;Shilnikova et al 2003;Tokarskaya et al 1995). Plutonium exposure has been associated with cancers of the lung, liver and bone, the sites of plutonium accumulation; further, increased cancer incidence and mortality were significantly associated with increased plutonium exposure (Gilbert et al 2000;Jacob et al 2007;Khokhryakov et al 2002;Kreisheimer et al 2000Kreisheimer et al , 2003Leggett et al 2005;Miller et al 2003;Sokolnikov et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%