“…On the more optimistic end of the distribution of opinions is a remark by Gotchy (1987) that pollution versus health effect correlations, such as used by Lave and Sesldn, are not adequate without other toxicological and epidemiological data but when interpreted as a whole, ca_: provide order-of-magnitude precision. Somewhat more pessimistic views have been expressed by others, such as Cox and Ricci (1990), who note that uncertainty is intrinsic and unavoidable in risk assessment and the choice of a dose-response function relating ambient levels of emissions from a power plant to resulting public-health consequences may be determined by regulatory fiat tempered by scientific hypotheses, theory, and empirical data. House (1981) similarly expressed that the high levels of uncertainty in health-related statistics add a dimension of confusion to pollution or safety information that only confuses the decision maker.…”