2018
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30423-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

Abstract: None.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
342
5
19

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(383 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
17
342
5
19
Order By: Relevance
“…153 In a collaborative, individual patient data pooled analysis of 11 518 patients with multivessel or LM disease randomized to CABG or PCI with stents, all-cause death was significantly different after CABG (9.2%) and PCI (11.2%) (P = 0.0038), which was evident in patients with diabetes (10.7 vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 0.0001) but not in patients without diabetes (8.4 vs. 8.7%, respectively; P = 0.81) (P interaction = 0.0077). 124 Similar results were found in the subgroup of 7040 patients with multivessel disease (P interaction = 0.0453), while the interaction with diabetes was not significant in the 4478 patients with LM disease (P interaction = 0.13).…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Vs Percutasupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…153 In a collaborative, individual patient data pooled analysis of 11 518 patients with multivessel or LM disease randomized to CABG or PCI with stents, all-cause death was significantly different after CABG (9.2%) and PCI (11.2%) (P = 0.0038), which was evident in patients with diabetes (10.7 vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 0.0001) but not in patients without diabetes (8.4 vs. 8.7%, respectively; P = 0.81) (P interaction = 0.0077). 124 Similar results were found in the subgroup of 7040 patients with multivessel disease (P interaction = 0.0453), while the interaction with diabetes was not significant in the 4478 patients with LM disease (P interaction = 0.13).…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Vs Percutasupporting
confidence: 65%
“…[121][122][123] In subsequent RCTs, the interaction of the strata of SYNTAX score with the effect of the randomized treatment was less pronounced and did not reach statistical significance. [105][106][107] However, in a recent collaborative individual patient pooled analysis of randomized trials including 11 518 patients, 124 the test for trend across the ordered tertiles of the SYNTAX score of the SYNTAX study was positive at P = 0.0011 (unpublished analysis), confirming the strata of the SYNTAX score as an effect modifier to be considered. There is concern about bias and inter-individual variability in calculating the SYNTAX score.…”
Section: Anatomical Complexity Of Coronary Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations