Clause Linkage in Cross-Linguistic Perspective 2012
DOI: 10.1515/9783110280692.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphosyntactic properties and scope behavior of ‘subordinate’ clauses in Puma (Kiranti)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 However, the individual clause linkage types show varying degrees of semantic integration and dependency on the main clause, and the morphosyntactic properties of these adverbial clauses do not always correlate in expected ways. Distinctions made by one variable, e.g., coreference of certain arguments, may be crosscut by other variables, e.g., finiteness Schackow et al (2012) for a case study on Puma (also Kiranti)). Table 14.2 shows an overview of the individual Yakkha clause linkage types and their markers, classified according to their semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, the individual clause linkage types show varying degrees of semantic integration and dependency on the main clause, and the morphosyntactic properties of these adverbial clauses do not always correlate in expected ways. Distinctions made by one variable, e.g., coreference of certain arguments, may be crosscut by other variables, e.g., finiteness Schackow et al (2012) for a case study on Puma (also Kiranti)). Table 14.2 shows an overview of the individual Yakkha clause linkage types and their markers, classified according to their semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%