“…4 However, the individual clause linkage types show varying degrees of semantic integration and dependency on the main clause, and the morphosyntactic properties of these adverbial clauses do not always correlate in expected ways. Distinctions made by one variable, e.g., coreference of certain arguments, may be crosscut by other variables, e.g., finiteness Schackow et al (2012) for a case study on Puma (also Kiranti)). Table 14.2 shows an overview of the individual Yakkha clause linkage types and their markers, classified according to their semantics.…”