2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphosyntactic and syntactic priming: an investigation of underlying processing mechanisms and the effects of Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a morphosyntactic priming task, Arnott et al (2005) found that although PD participants could access morphosyntactic information in a similar way to age-matched controls, the information decayed much more quickly for the PD participants. They further suggested that people with PD experience problems with post-lexical integration.…”
Section: Deliberative Processing and Parkinson's Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using a morphosyntactic priming task, Arnott et al (2005) found that although PD participants could access morphosyntactic information in a similar way to age-matched controls, the information decayed much more quickly for the PD participants. They further suggested that people with PD experience problems with post-lexical integration.…”
Section: Deliberative Processing and Parkinson's Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Data from studies using a variety of methodologies indicate that PD negatively affects morphosyntactic processing, although the nature of these deficits has yet to be resolved and most research has focused on comprehension rather than production. With respect to comprehension, understanding of complex syntactic structures (e.g., noncanonical constructions such as passives; sentences with center embedded clauses) appears most vulnerable in individuals with PD, as evidenced by their performance of offline listening or reading tasks such as sentence-picture matching and grammaticality judgment (Angwin, Chenery, Copland, Murdoch, & Silburn, 2006; Arnott, Chenery, Murdoch, & Silburn, 2005; Colman, Koerts, van Beilen, Leenders, & Bastiaanse, 2006; Hochstadt, Nakano, Lieberman, & Friedman, 2006; Terzi, Papapetropoulos, & Kouvelas, 2005; Whiting et al, 2005; Zanini et al, 2004). For instance, Hochstadt and colleagues required individuals with PD to complete a sentence-picture matching task in which the sentence stimuli varied in terms of complexity (i.e., simple vs. complex with center-embedded or final relative clauses), voice (i.e., active vs. passive), and semantic constraint (i.e., real word knowledge could vs. could not be applied to facilitate comprehension).…”
Section: Morphosyntactic Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General language impairments in PD Language deficits in individuals suffering from PD have now been extensively reported in the literature (Cummings et al 1988). Studies derived from simple picture tasks (Arnott et al 2005), together with data from functional imaging (Grossman et al 2003), suggest that PD can affect most aspects of language comprehension and production (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%