2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2002.tb00076.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphostructural constraints and phylogenetic overprint on sutural frilling in Late Jurassic ammonites

Abstract: The functional signi cance of frilled septa and complex sutures in ammonoids has generated ongoing debate. The 'classic' hypothesis envisages ammonoid shells and septa as designed for resisting ambient hydrostatic pressure, complex sutures being the evidence of strength in shells for colonization of deep habitats. Here we address the 'suture problem', focusing on the analysis and interpretation of variables in our database of Late Jurassic ammonites not included in previous studies, such as whorl height (W h )… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical morphofunctional interpretation (often called the Buckland hypothesis) is that increasing suture indentation leads to forms adapted to deeper water depth, because it is supposed to provide buttressing against hydrostatic pressure on the phragmocone (Buckland 1836;Pfaff 1911;Saunders 1995;De Blasio 2008; and references inside). However, this function of the septal folding remains controversial (Saunders 1995;OlÕriz et al 2002;Lewy 2002) and constructional constraints complicate its interpretation (see discussion in Monnet et al 2011) leading to the idea that the evolution of the suture indentation of ammonoids exceeds their functional needs or limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical morphofunctional interpretation (often called the Buckland hypothesis) is that increasing suture indentation leads to forms adapted to deeper water depth, because it is supposed to provide buttressing against hydrostatic pressure on the phragmocone (Buckland 1836;Pfaff 1911;Saunders 1995;De Blasio 2008; and references inside). However, this function of the septal folding remains controversial (Saunders 1995;OlÕriz et al 2002;Lewy 2002) and constructional constraints complicate its interpretation (see discussion in Monnet et al 2011) leading to the idea that the evolution of the suture indentation of ammonoids exceeds their functional needs or limits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After more than 160 years of debate, the interpretation of extreme septal folding in ammonoids is still controversial, as sutural complexity has been tentatively related to a wide spectrum of functions, including: (1) structural reinforcement of phragmocones against the hydrostatic load or the pressure generated by predator teeth; (2) area increase for mantle‐to‐septum joining; (3) a role in buoyancy control; and (4) a metabolic function linked to respiration or cameral liquid transport (for reviews and references, Raup & Stanley 1971; Ward 1981; Saunders & Work 1996, 1997; Olóriz et al . 1997, 1999, 2002; Pérez‐Claros 1999, 2005; Saunders et al. 1999; Lewy 2002; Pérez‐Claros et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1990; Boyajian & Lutz 1992; Lutz & Boyajian 1995; Olóriz & Palmqvist 1995; Olóriz et al . 1997, 1999, 2002; Pérez‐Claros et al. 2002), and is the methodology we have chosen for our case study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If septal complexity is biologically constrained by the morphology of the shell [ 76 , 77 ], then the evolutionary drive to enhance early physiological function in the shell that we propose can, at least partially, explain the origin of septal complexity as a consequence of high SA C :V C /SA S :V C . A correlation between conch shape and septal complexity has been observed and can be interpreted in favor of this idea [ 38 , 78 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%