2011
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2011.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometry and number of spermatozoa in drone honeybees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) reared under different conditions

Abstract: Abstract. The effects of three factors operating during pre-emergence development period on some characteristics of drones were studied. Weight of newly emerged drones, length of forewing, length of tibia, length of femur, length and width of basitarsus and number of spermatozoa in drones from colonies in which the workers had access to drone brood (A), the size of brood cells differed (B) or the colony had a queen or was queenless (C), were determined. For this purpose, 9 colonies were chosen at random from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, the larvae were starved for ten hours, but this period could be effectively shorter for mass provisioned younger larvae than for progressively provisioned older larvae. Although body mass at emergence decreased through starvation in our study it still corresponded to average drone mass reported in literature ranging from 200 -290 mg (Jay, 1963;Woyke, 1978;Gençer & Firatli, 2005;Mazeed, 2011, Szentgyörgyi et al, 2016. Semen volume, which is vital for drone fitness, was unaffected by starvation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experiment, the larvae were starved for ten hours, but this period could be effectively shorter for mass provisioned younger larvae than for progressively provisioned older larvae. Although body mass at emergence decreased through starvation in our study it still corresponded to average drone mass reported in literature ranging from 200 -290 mg (Jay, 1963;Woyke, 1978;Gençer & Firatli, 2005;Mazeed, 2011, Szentgyörgyi et al, 2016. Semen volume, which is vital for drone fitness, was unaffected by starvation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It particularly influenced six-day-old larvae. The effect of early and late starvation differed probably because nursing bees feed the larvae differently according to age, needs (Haydak, 1970) and the colony's status (Mazeed, 2011). Chemical analysis showed that there is a substantial difference in food provisioned to 2-and 6-day-old drones (Matsuka et al, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size and body mass of drones can change due to a number of conditions during their development. Drones that are undernourished (Czekońska et al ., 2015; Szentgyörgyi et al ., 2016), tended in suboptimal temperatures (Jaycox, 1961), or infested with parasites (Duay et al ., 2003; Retschnig et al ., 2014) during larval period are smaller and lighter at emergence; however, drones reared in queenless colonies are heavier than those reared in queenright colonies (Mazeed, 2011). Drones reared in larger colonies (Free & Williams, 1975), colonies that more intensively hoard pollen (Rueppell et al ., 2006 a , b ) or have better nutritional conditions (Czekońska et al ., 2015) are also usually larger and heavier at emergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that affect the body mass of the newly emerged drones include feeding, number of attending workers, and nest temperature (Haydak 1970;Free and Williams 1975;Hrassnigg and Crailsheim 2005;Czekońska et al 2015;Szentgyörgyi et al 2016). At a later age, the body mass of drones is mainly determined by the colony maintaining them and depends on its size, the presence of a queen, food availability, and health status (Wharton et al 2007(Wharton et al , 2008Boes 2010;Mazeed 2011;Czekońska et al 2019). The body mass of drones can be affected by many factors; therefore, marked differences are observed between colonies both in this and in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%