1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb05134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric variation in the Nearctic collared lemming (Dicrostonyx)

Abstract: A. H. Macpherson suggested that much of the current geographic diversity in Canadian Arctic mammals resulted from isolation in refugia during the Wisconsin glacial stage. This study evaluates the refugium hypothesis, insofar as it applies to Nearctic Dicrostonyx, by means of a statistical analysis of geographic variation in 13 skull characters. Overall, geographic variation among samples is not significant, although D. hudsonius and D. unalascensis are geographically and morphologically distinct. Some variatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main phylogenetic division between the Eurasian D. torquatus and the North American group of species had resulted from isolation by intermittent inundation of the Bering Strait during the interglacial periods (FEDOROV et al 1999a). In North America the following glacial vicariant separation in three refugial areas probably generated the extant species diversity, D. groenlundicus evolved in ice-free areas to the north west of the Laurentide ice sheet, whereas D. hudsonius and D. richardsoni likely derived from the southeastern and southwestern periglacial areas, respectively (MACPHERSON 1965;CHALINE 1987;ENGSTROM et al 1993;EGER 1995). However, the estimate of divergence among the three North America species suggests that the vicariant events predated the last glaciation (Wisconsin; 10-1 1 5 kyr; ANDERSEN and BORNS 1997).…”
Section: Pattern and Timing Of Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main phylogenetic division between the Eurasian D. torquatus and the North American group of species had resulted from isolation by intermittent inundation of the Bering Strait during the interglacial periods (FEDOROV et al 1999a). In North America the following glacial vicariant separation in three refugial areas probably generated the extant species diversity, D. groenlundicus evolved in ice-free areas to the north west of the Laurentide ice sheet, whereas D. hudsonius and D. richardsoni likely derived from the southeastern and southwestern periglacial areas, respectively (MACPHERSON 1965;CHALINE 1987;ENGSTROM et al 1993;EGER 1995). However, the estimate of divergence among the three North America species suggests that the vicariant events predated the last glaciation (Wisconsin; 10-1 1 5 kyr; ANDERSEN and BORNS 1997).…”
Section: Pattern and Timing Of Speciationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of divergence among the three North American species suggests that the vicariant events predated the latest glaciation (Weichsel; 10-115 kyr; Andersen & Borns, 1997). D. gmnlandicus evolved in ice free areas t o the north of the main ice sheet, whereas the D. hudsonius and D. richardsoni likely derived from the southeastern and southwestern periglacial areas, respectively (Chaline, 1987;Engstrom et al, 1993;Eger, 1995).…”
Section: Phylogeography Of Collared Lemmingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the host and parasite colonized Greenland postglacially from the ice-free areas of the Canadian Arctic islands (Fedorov & Goropashnaya, 1999), the genetic divergence of the Greenland population of A. arctica (host D. gmenlandicus) can be explained by the founder effect (migration of a small number of individuals). It is also possible that collared lemmings 'overwintered in the coastal part of North Greenland (Macpherson, 1965;Eger, 1995); in this case the parasite divergence would reflect genetic drift in a small refugial lemming population.…”
Section: Phylogeography Of Collared Lemmingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, eight valid species are recognized in the genus Dicrostonyx based on morphological, caryological, hybridological and genetic data (Rausch & Rausch ; Tchernyavskiy & Kozlovskiy ; Krohne ; Gileva ; van Wynsberghe & Engstrom ; Borowik & Engstrom ; Engstrom et al . ; Eger ; Fedorov et al . ; Ehrich et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, eight valid species are recognized in the genus Dicrostonyx based on morphological, caryological, hybridological and genetic data (Rausch & Rausch 1972;Tchernyavskiy & Kozlovskiy 1980;Krohne 1982;Gileva 1983; van Wynsberghe & Engstrom 1992;Borowik & Engstrom 1993;Engstrom et al 1993;Eger 1995;Fedorov et al 1999;Ehrich et al 2000;Abramson & Tikhonova 2002;Musser & Carleton 2005). Only two species inhabit Eurasia: D. torquatus (Pallas, 1779) on the continent and D. vinogradovi (Ognev, 1948) on Wrangel Island; the six other species live in North America.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%