2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0150-9861(06)77253-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric comparison of the human corpus callosum in deaf and hearing subjects: an MRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two-sample t tests were conducted to reveal where deaf individuals exhibited greater GMV or WMV than hearing individuals and vice versa. Images were thresholded at a height level of p Ͻ 0.005 (minimum cluster size ϭ 95 contiguous voxels) and nonstationary cluster corrected (Hayasaka et al, 2004) at a threshold of p Ͻ 0.05. There were no between-group differences in total intracranial volume (TIV: the sum of whole-brain GMV, WMV, and CSF), but to be sure to infer regional variation in brain matter, this measure was included as a regressor of no interest in the analyses (Peelle et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two-sample t tests were conducted to reveal where deaf individuals exhibited greater GMV or WMV than hearing individuals and vice versa. Images were thresholded at a height level of p Ͻ 0.005 (minimum cluster size ϭ 95 contiguous voxels) and nonstationary cluster corrected (Hayasaka et al, 2004) at a threshold of p Ͻ 0.05. There were no between-group differences in total intracranial volume (TIV: the sum of whole-brain GMV, WMV, and CSF), but to be sure to infer regional variation in brain matter, this measure was included as a regressor of no interest in the analyses (Peelle et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, observation of more GMV could reflect normal maturation, but also failure to mature, depending on the location. In sum, the mechanisms underlying microstructural changes and their interpretation require further study and will benefit from other measures, such as gyrification patterns (Im et al, 2010). Whether classical language areas in the left superior temporal lobe, also closely located to auditory cortex, are used differently in the deaf has been a topic of debate, especially in the context of sign language processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este se afila para formar o rostro do CC, porção contígua à comissura anterior. Alterações de espessura e volume do CC, em estudos com ressonância magnética de adultos, descrevem as mais variadas correlações com patologias psiquiátricas e neurológicas, tais como: déficit de atenção, hiperatividade, distúrbio bipolar, esquizofrenia e alterações da audição [17][18][19] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Third, there is also a wide variation in the age in these groups and only one study focused on babies who were being evaluated for cochlear implants (K. M. Smith et al, 2011). Fourth, while morphometry analysis focused on mostly volumes of gray matter and white matter structures, nine measured cortical thickness (Hribar et al, 2014;Kumar & Mishra, 2018;Pereira-Jorge et al, 2018;Ratnanather et al, 2019;Shiell et al, 2016;Shiohama et al, 2019;Smittenaar et al, 2016) and one measured surface area (Kara et al, 2006). Fifth, weak differences were observed in several structures.…”
Section: The Deafened Auditory Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%