2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric and molecular discrimination of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, (Zehntner, 1897) and the sorghum aphid Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald, 1904)

Abstract: Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner, 1897) and Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald, 1904) are major worldwide crop pests causing direct feeding damage on sorghum and transmitting viruses to sugarcane. It is common in the scientific literature to consider these two species as synonyms, referred to as the ‘sugarcane aphid’, although no formal study has validated this synonymy. In this study, based on the comparison of samples collected from their whole distribution area, we use both morphometric and molecular data to better c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald) which was until recently known as Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner in previous literature ( Nibouche et al, 2021 ), is an invasive multivoltine piercing and sucking pest of sugarcane, Saccharum officinarum (L.), and sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) in Asia, Africa, Oceania, Central, South and North America ( Sharma and Nwanze, 1997 ; Singh et al, 2004 ). Melanaphis sorgi was first detected on the Florida peninsula on the southeastern coast of the United States in 1977 and consequently only achieved a minor pest status in sugarcane production ( Denmark, 1988 ; Mondor et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald) which was until recently known as Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner in previous literature ( Nibouche et al, 2021 ), is an invasive multivoltine piercing and sucking pest of sugarcane, Saccharum officinarum (L.), and sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) in Asia, Africa, Oceania, Central, South and North America ( Sharma and Nwanze, 1997 ; Singh et al, 2004 ). Melanaphis sorgi was first detected on the Florida peninsula on the southeastern coast of the United States in 1977 and consequently only achieved a minor pest status in sugarcane production ( Denmark, 1988 ; Mondor et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the U.S. since 2013, the MLL-F “superclone” ( M. sorghi ) has been found feeding on sorghum, sugarcane, Johnsongrass, giant miscanthus, and Columbus grass whereas aphids classified as MLL-D have been found feeding only on sugarcane [ 13 , 14 ]. Recently, MLL-C, and D aphids have been classified as M. sacchari , MLL-A and F aphids have been reclassified as M. sorghi, and MLL B and E aphids have not been assigned a species designation although SSR and EF1-α sequence data suggest both belongs to M. sorghi [ 15 ]. Although the Entomological Society of America has not adopted this change, the common names have also been altered and aphids that are classified as M. sacchari have a common name as sugarcane aphids and aphids classified as M. sorghi are now called sorghum aphids [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…samples were collected from Peru on sugarcane and were also found to be MLL-C [ 13 ]. In a personal communication, three samples collected from Brazil in 2020 were reported to be M. sorghi but the host plant (sorghum or sugarcane) from which it was collected or the MLL it was assigned was not reported [ 15 ]. Diversity of Melanaphis spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supported by morphometric and molecular research, the aphid on sorghum and Johnson grass is considered a superclone, distinct from that found on sugarcane [ 2 ]. It was reclassified as Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with its likely origin in Africa or Asia [ 3 ]. Since 2013, M. sorghi outbreaks on sorghum have caused economic loss resulting from direct plant damage that reduces seed yield and from indirect seed yield loss due to aphid honeydew disrupting mechanical harvest [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%