2017
DOI: 10.3106/041.042.0406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric and Genetic Determination of Age Class and Sex for Fecal Pellets of Sika Deer (Cervus nippon)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding age groups, the average of the morphometric variables was always higher in the adults than in the yearlings and fawns. This assumption agrees with the findings by MacCracken & Van (2011) for reindeer, Woodruff et al (2016) for Sonoran pronghorn, and Hanya et al (2017) for sika deer. Sánchez-Rojas et al (2004) found that in mule deer, the faecal pellets belonging to the yearlings were more rounded, and the length/width proportion was lower in the yearlings than in the adults, but no significant differences were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding age groups, the average of the morphometric variables was always higher in the adults than in the yearlings and fawns. This assumption agrees with the findings by MacCracken & Van (2011) for reindeer, Woodruff et al (2016) for Sonoran pronghorn, and Hanya et al (2017) for sika deer. Sánchez-Rojas et al (2004) found that in mule deer, the faecal pellets belonging to the yearlings were more rounded, and the length/width proportion was lower in the yearlings than in the adults, but no significant differences were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Traditional detection-based monitoring is timeconsuming and labor-intensive (Hanya, Yoshihiro, Zamma, Kubo, & Takahata, 2003;Whitesides, Oates, Green, & Kluberdanz, 1988), and the precision of identifying species or age-sex classes may depend on the ability of the observers. Methods based on animal traces, such as feces, nests or footprints, enable researchers to collect more data per unit effort than detection-based methods (Delibes et al, 2012;Hanya et al, 2017;Kanamori, Kuze, Bernard, Malim, & Kohshima, 2017). However, one can only obtain limited information on the individual animal that left the trace compared with direct observation (Hanya et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on animal traces, such as feces, nests or footprints, enable researchers to collect more data per unit effort than detection-based methods (Delibes et al, 2012;Hanya et al, 2017;Kanamori, Kuze, Bernard, Malim, & Kohshima, 2017). However, one can only obtain limited information on the individual animal that left the trace compared with direct observation (Hanya et al, 2017). Camera trapping is a powerful method that can reveal not only the species or age-sex classes but also the behavior of the filmed animals (Pebsworth & LaFleur, 2014), and it requires minimum effort in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%