2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00683.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric analysis of facial landmark data to characterize the facial phenotype associated with fetal alcohol syndrome

Abstract: Procrustes analysis and principal component analysis were applied to stereo-photogrammetrically obtained landmarks to compare the facial features associated with fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) in subjects with FAS and normal controls. Two studies were performed; both compared facial landmark data of FAS and normal subjects, but they differed in the number of landmarks chosen. The first study compared landmarks representing palpebral fissure length, upper lip thinness and philtrum smoothness and revealed no signi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(116 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other recently reported human morphometric and 3D analysis data regarding abnormalities in the shape of the face have provided for the classification of children with FAS (e.g. Mutsvangwa & Douglas, 2007; Mutsvangwa et al, 2010). Facial morphometric techniques have also been applied to a mouse model to define strain-dependent ethanol-induced alterations with results indicating deficiencies in facial depth measures following GD7 exposure (Anthony et al, 2010), a finding that is consistent with the “flattened midface” associated with FAS (Moore et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recently reported human morphometric and 3D analysis data regarding abnormalities in the shape of the face have provided for the classification of children with FAS (e.g. Mutsvangwa & Douglas, 2007; Mutsvangwa et al, 2010). Facial morphometric techniques have also been applied to a mouse model to define strain-dependent ethanol-induced alterations with results indicating deficiencies in facial depth measures following GD7 exposure (Anthony et al, 2010), a finding that is consistent with the “flattened midface” associated with FAS (Moore et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She used genetic algorithm and eye template to automatically locate the eye landmarks in her study [7]. Mutsugawa and Douglas extensive study on the used of stereophotogammetry craniofacial anthropometry as a tool in FAS screening has been accepted as a standard procedure to screen FAS in children [8][9]. Automatic locating and extracting the facial landmarks proposed by Douglas is an alternative method to reduce the inter and intra examiner errors in craniofacial anthropometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To define boundaries for these regions in face processing applications, most researchers have followed a point-based approach. Unfortunately, a variety of terminology is observed in the literature: a) Anchor point: Colbry and Stockman (2007), Colbry et al (2005) b) Keypoint: Mian et al (2008) c) Facial landmark: Gizatdinova and Surakka (2007), Mutsvangwa and Douglas (2007), Whitmarsh et al (2006), Gizatdinova and Surakka (2006) d) Fiducial point: Arca et al (2006), Wiskott et al (1997), Bronstein et al (2005) e) Feature point : Xiaoguang et al (2006), Hallinan et al (1999) This variety might be because in essence those names refer to different sets of points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers, e.g. Mutsvangwa and Douglas (2007), used the term 'facial landmark' in their investigation. An extended list of terminology for a landmark is found in Dryden and Mardia (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%