2016
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphomechanics and Developmental Constraints in the Evolution of Ammonites Shell Form

Abstract: The idea that physical processes involved in biological development underlie morphogenetic rules and channel morphological evolution has been central to the rise of evolutionary developmental biology. Here, we explore this idea in the context of seashell morphogenesis. We show that a morphomechanical model predicts the effects of variations in shell shape on the ornamental pattern in ammonites, a now extinct group of cephalopods with external chambered shell. Our model shows that several seemingly unrelated ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns of intraspecific variation have been observed in Triassic [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77], in Jurassic [66] and in Cretaceous [78] ammonoids. As these patterns of covariation have been observed in phylogenetically distant ammonoids at several different time periods, they represent evolutionary convergences that stem from the developmental constraints imposed by accretionary growth [19,[79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Correlation Of Shell Characters and Evo-devo Of The Molluscamentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patterns of intraspecific variation have been observed in Triassic [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77], in Jurassic [66] and in Cretaceous [78] ammonoids. As these patterns of covariation have been observed in phylogenetically distant ammonoids at several different time periods, they represent evolutionary convergences that stem from the developmental constraints imposed by accretionary growth [19,[79][80][81][82][83].…”
Section: Correlation Of Shell Characters and Evo-devo Of The Molluscamentioning
confidence: 78%
“…These covariations have been recently explained using a mechanical model, whereby ammonoid shells act as biomechanical oscillators [82,83]. More generally, two types of dynamic models have been proposed to account for the morphogenesis of ornamentation in ammonoids: lateral inhibition (chemical) models and mechanical models (see review in [80]).…”
Section: Correlation Of Shell Characters and Evo-devo Of The Molluscamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These morphospaces are far more difficult to produce and have yet to be constructed for many clades. Successes have largely come from taxa with accretionary skeletons, such as mollusks, brachiopods, and echinoids (e.g., Chakra & Stone, 2011;Chirat, Moulton, & Goreily, 2013;Erlich, Moulton, Goriely, & Chirat, 2016;McGhee, 2007;Saucède et al, 2015). However, the most productive effort has been the computational model for mammalian teeth based on the genetic and cellular interactions that underlie development (Salazar-Ciudad & Jernvall, 2010).…”
Section: Morphospaces Empirical and Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raupian equations for shell coiling and growth have been used for the construction of simple, smooth 3D shell models . Raup's equations were limited to modeling smooth shells and were also inaccurate in modeling the true geometry of shell growth, which lead to a number of computational methods to more accurately model shell geometry, including those with complicated, ornamented shell features …”
Section: Overview Of Finite Element Modeling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%