1985
DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-24-1-1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of the type and Australian species of Dudresnaya (Dumontiaceae, Rhodophyta)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dudresnaya japonica was described by Okamura (1908) with syntype localities of Cape Nomo (Nagasaki Prefecture), Futaye (Island Amakusa), Mie Prefecture, and Kanagawa Prefecture. The traits seen in the Omani plants agree in most respects with the account given by Robins and Kraft (1985) of this species, except for the non-cleft cystocarps and the absence of the mucilage coat around the auxiliary cell filament. Robins and Kraft depicted D. japonica as most closely related to Dudresnaya hawaiiensis R. K. S. Lee.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Dudresnaya japonica was described by Okamura (1908) with syntype localities of Cape Nomo (Nagasaki Prefecture), Futaye (Island Amakusa), Mie Prefecture, and Kanagawa Prefecture. The traits seen in the Omani plants agree in most respects with the account given by Robins and Kraft (1985) of this species, except for the non-cleft cystocarps and the absence of the mucilage coat around the auxiliary cell filament. Robins and Kraft depicted D. japonica as most closely related to Dudresnaya hawaiiensis R. K. S. Lee.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…(185) See Abbott (1962~) and Hawkes (1982). (186) See Robins and Kraft (1985). (187) Howe (1905) stated that this species does not belong to Dudresnaya; its status is uncertain.…”
Section: (130) This Species Has Been Reported Northward To Northmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new species bears a strong resemblance in the field to Dudresnaya australis (Robins & Kraft, 1985, fig. 18), with which it was sometimes initially confused.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%