Morphology of the Greater Trochanter: An Assessment of Anatomic Variation and Canal Overhang

Abstract

Background: Varus malposition is a risk of early failure in total hip arthroplasty. The degree to which the tip of the greater trochanter (GT) overhangs the canal can increase this risk. Although we know proximal femoral anatomy is variable, no study has addressed variations in medial overhang of the GT on plain radiographs. Methods: All low anteroposterior pelvis radiographs more than 1 year were reviewed 3 times by 2 orthopaedic surgeons and one radiologist. The canal width (CW) was measured 10 cm below the lesser trochanter. Canal overhang (CO) was defined by the distance between the lateral medullary canal and a parallel line beginning at the most medial aspect of the GT. The overhang index (OI) is defined as the percentage of the canal overhung by the GT. Results: The mean CW was 13.5 mm, mean CO 16.4 mm, and mean OI 1.22. Hips were then classified as the following: (A) OI < 0.5 (n ¼ 8), (B) OI 0.5-1.0 (n ¼ 78), (C) OI 1.0-1.5 (n ¼ 191), and (D) OI > 1.5 (n ¼ 68). Intraobserver reliability was excellent for all measures: 0.89 (confidence interval: 0.87-0.91) for CW, 0.96 (0.95-0.97) for CO, and 0.97 (0.97-0.98) for OI. Interobserver reliability was good for CW 0.75 (0.70-0.79) and excellent for CO 0.90 (0.88-0.92) and OI 0.95 (0.94-0.96). Conclusions: Variations in the morphology of the proximal femur can predispose to varus component malposition. The degree to which the GT overhangs the canal can be quantified and classified based on plain films. This can aid in preoperative planning and help guide intraoperative proximal femoral preparation.

Greater trochanter morphology and association with patient demographics, surgical factors, and post-operative stem position: a retrospective assessment of 150 cementless THRs in 135 dogs

“…These include reduced exposure and access to the femoral canal, iatrogenic damage to the gluteal tendons, increased risk of intra-operative femur fracture, and post-operative stem malalignment [ 17 , 29 – 31 ]. Techniques to objectively assess and classify trochanter position relative to the trochanteric fossa and anatomic axis of the femur have been described in human THR patients [ 22 , 29 ]. These classification techniques are recommended pre-operatively during THR templating to guide intra-operative broaching and stem placement.…”