2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.063529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of the Galactic dark matter synchrotron emission with self-consistent cosmic-ray diffusion models

Abstract: A generic prediction in the paradigm of weakly interacting dark matter is the production of relativistic particles from dark matter pair-annihilation in regions of high dark matter density. Ultrarelativistic electrons and positrons produced in the center of the Galaxy by dark matter annihilation should produce a diffuse synchrotron emission. While the spectral shape of the synchrotron dark matter haze depends on the particle model (and secondarily on the galactic magnetic fields), the morphology of the haze de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Trotta et al (2011) constrained the isotropically-averaged diffusivity κ to be ∼ 6 × 10 28 cm 2 /s to within a factor of a few, at ∼GeV energy with GALPROP, using the measured energy spectra and abundances of nuclei species in CRs, and adopting a flat halo diffusion model (Ginzburg & Ptuskin 1976; see Introduction for a brief description). Implicitly, these abundances depend on the residence time of CRs in the Galaxy, so there is a degeneracy between κ and the CR halo height z h (typically 1-10 kpc), out of which CRs can freely propagate (see Figure 3 in Trotta et al 2011 or Figure 10 in Linden et al 2010; this issue was also discussed in Ginzburg & Ptuskin 1976). Even in this model, it is possible to match the observational data with a significantly larger κ (up to factors of several) if a larger halo size is adopted.…”
Section: The Diffusion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Trotta et al (2011) constrained the isotropically-averaged diffusivity κ to be ∼ 6 × 10 28 cm 2 /s to within a factor of a few, at ∼GeV energy with GALPROP, using the measured energy spectra and abundances of nuclei species in CRs, and adopting a flat halo diffusion model (Ginzburg & Ptuskin 1976; see Introduction for a brief description). Implicitly, these abundances depend on the residence time of CRs in the Galaxy, so there is a degeneracy between κ and the CR halo height z h (typically 1-10 kpc), out of which CRs can freely propagate (see Figure 3 in Trotta et al 2011 or Figure 10 in Linden et al 2010; this issue was also discussed in Ginzburg & Ptuskin 1976). Even in this model, it is possible to match the observational data with a significantly larger κ (up to factors of several) if a larger halo size is adopted.…”
Section: The Diffusion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For example,Fig. 10inLinden et al (2010) shows isotropically-averaged κ ∼ 3 × 10 28 cm 2 /s with z h ∼ 3 kpc but κ ∼ 10 29 cm 2 /s with a larger z h ∼ 5 kpc).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum as well as the dynamics of the particle physics scenario, along with the DM profile in a dSph, is responsible for DM annihilation as well as the subsequent cascades leading to electron-positron pairs. The electron(positron) energy distribution at the initial level is also the determined by the above factors [39][40][41]. However, they subsequently pass through the interstellar medium (ISM) of the galaxy, facing several additional effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This degeneracy is lifted once 𝑧 𝐻 𝑟 ∼ 10kpc, i.e. of order the CR injection length scale in the disk (see, e.g., Figure 10 in Linden et al 2010). The physical reason is that for 𝑧 𝑟, CRs start propagating spherically away from the galaxy and have a smaller chance of making it back to the disk.…”
Section: Nonlinear Damping Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%