2006
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2006.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of Molar-Tooth Structures in Precambrian Carbonates: Influence of Substrate Rheology and Implications for Genesis

Abstract: Molar-tooth (MT) is an enigmatic carbonate fabric composed of variously shaped cracks and voids filled with a characteristically uniform, equant microspar. MT is both abundant and widespread in Mesoproterozoic and early Neoproterozoic strata, where void-filling microspar comprises up to 90% of individual beds and 5-25% of preserved carbonate. The temporal restriction of this fabric suggests a potential link between MT formation and the biogeochemical evolution of marine environments. Detailed petrographic rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(107 reference statements)
2
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases on Earth, the cracks are filled by other sediments, however, in one very particular instance known as "molar tooth structure" spindle--shaped cracks and related subspherical voids are filled with mineral (calcite) cement. The origin of subaqueous cracks on Earth is poorly understood, though the involvement of gas in generating the cracks and voids represented by molar tooth structure is likely (43,47). As with the hollow nodules, a number of processes could generate gases in Martian sediments.…”
Section: Diagenesis Of the Sheepbed Mudstonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases on Earth, the cracks are filled by other sediments, however, in one very particular instance known as "molar tooth structure" spindle--shaped cracks and related subspherical voids are filled with mineral (calcite) cement. The origin of subaqueous cracks on Earth is poorly understood, though the involvement of gas in generating the cracks and voids represented by molar tooth structure is likely (43,47). As with the hollow nodules, a number of processes could generate gases in Martian sediments.…”
Section: Diagenesis Of the Sheepbed Mudstonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority opinion, however, does not question its primary carbonate composition, considers it not as a replacement product but as crack-filling cement; these researchers, nevertheless differ widely with regard to the mechanism for crack generation. Tectonic fracturing (Daly, 1912;Cowan and James, 1992;Smith and Winston, 1997;Bishop and Sumner, 2006), earthquake induced dewatering (Fairchild et al, 1997;Pratt, 1998b), desiccation or synaeresis (Bell, 1966;Horodyski, 1976Horodyski, , 1983Young and Long, 1977;Hofmann, 1985;Beukes, 1987;Knoll and Swett, 1990;Calver and Baillie, 1990;Demicco and Hardie, 1994;Liu et al, 2005) and fluid pressure (Dix and Mullins, 1987;Desrochers and Al-Aasm, 1993;Mozley and Burns, 1993;Furniss et al, 1994Furniss et al, , 1997James et al, 1998;Kuznetsov, 2003;Pope et al, 2003;Marshall and Anglin, 2004;Pollock et al, 2006) have all been suggested in this respect.…”
Section: Molar Tooth Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meng and Ge (2002) contemplated a relation between MTS and prevalent bioforms transitional to Phanerozoic multicellular forms, and suggested that related micro-bioelectromagnetic waves encouraged CaCO 3 precipitation within cracks induced by CO 2 overpressuring. Pollock et al (2006) proposed intimate links between crack formation and concomitant microspar precipitation and the decomposition of sedimentary organic matter in the presence of supersaturated seawater; they produced a variety of crack morphologies within unconsolidated mud under gas pressure in the laboratory. Proliferation of sulphate reducing bacteria and methanogens in the Proterozoic time period could have promoted carbonate precipitation within cracks (e.g., Vasconcelas and McKenzie, 1997;Wright, 1999;van Lith et al, 2003;Roberts et al, 2004;Wright and Oren, 2005;Wacey, 2004, 2005).…”
Section: Molar Tooth Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, stratigraphically higher siliciclastic intervals represent lowstand deposition following craton-wide fl ooding and development of the Atar Formation Conophyton-Jacutophyton biostromes ). Disappearance of fl at-clast breccias and fl at-laminated microbial carbonate interbeds in stratigraphically higher siliciclastic intervals and their replacement by small (<2 m thick) discontinuous bioherms of irregularly branching columnar stromatolites (Tungussia confusa; BertrandSarfati & Moussine-Pouchkine, 1999), as well as rare intervals of 'molar-tooth' carbonate (Furniss et al, 1998;James et al, 1998;Pollock et al, 2006) suggest shallow-marine deposition and overall greater accommodation space across the platform.…”
Section: Lithology and Sequence Stratigraphic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%