2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of Form I′ crystals of polybutene-1 formed on melt-crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,12−15 In addition, form I′ shows up−down disorder in side groups within the crystalline structure, as evidenced by electron diffraction measurements. 16 Besides, their crystalline morphology is different 17 and the lamellar thickness of form I′ at the same crystallization temperature is much smaller than those of form II and form I giving form I′ the lowest melting point among them. 18 The growth rate of form I′ is much lower than that of form II 19 manifesting a much higher secondary nucleation barrier on the growth crystal front for form I′ than form II.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,12−15 In addition, form I′ shows up−down disorder in side groups within the crystalline structure, as evidenced by electron diffraction measurements. 16 Besides, their crystalline morphology is different 17 and the lamellar thickness of form I′ at the same crystallization temperature is much smaller than those of form II and form I giving form I′ the lowest melting point among them. 18 The growth rate of form I′ is much lower than that of form II 19 manifesting a much higher secondary nucleation barrier on the growth crystal front for form I′ than form II.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Form I and form I′ have the same helix structure as well as a wide-angle X-ray diffraction pattern , and they are distinguished by the origin of formation, that is, form I is the one transformed from form II through a solid–solid phase transition, while form I′ directly crystallizes from the melt or solution. , In addition, form I′ shows up–down disorder in side groups within the crystalline structure, as evidenced by electron diffraction measurements . Besides, their crystalline morphology is different and the lamellar thickness of form I′ at the same crystallization temperature is much smaller than those of form II and form I giving form I′ the lowest melting point among them . The growth rate of form I′ is much lower than that of form II manifesting a much higher secondary nucleation barrier on the growth crystal front for form I′ than form II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the nucleation of the stable Form I occurs much more rarely in bulk crystallization than that of the predominant Form II, it can only be obtained through solid‐solid transition from Form II. However, Form I′, described as a defective Form I with lower melting temperature, can be formed through special crystallization procedures, such as solution crystallization, blending with iPP, or copolymerization with other monomers . Actually, quiescent aging at room temperature of Form II samples is generally used for generating trigonal Form I, where the molecular conformation of the chains is that of a 3/1 helix …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, Form I′ can be obtained by several methods, such as solution crystallization, 16 blending with isotactic polypropylene 15 or copolymerization with other monomers. [17][18][19] The transformation mechanism of Form II to Form I has been investigated for several decades. On a molecular level, it has been usually considered that the chirality of the 11/3 helix of Form II does not change when it transforms to Form I, which is made of 3/1 helix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%