2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022gl099885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of Extreme and Far Ultraviolet Martian Airglow Emissions Observed by the EMUS Instrument on Board the Emirates Mars Mission

Abstract: We present the first continuous observations of the extreme and far ultraviolet (EUV and FUV) dayglow emissions measured by Emirates Mars Ultraviolet Spectrometer (EMUS) onboard the Emirates Mars Mission. We found excellent agreement between the previous observations from the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope and recent observations by EMUS both in shape and magnitude. We presented the average disk brightness of major EUV and FUV emissions for about 10 months of data from April 2021 to February 2022. The solar act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy between the values could be due to HUT observations covering northern latitudes, where we expect less of Ar as it increases closer to the southern latitudes (see Section 3.4). In addition, EMUS data shows a geophysical variability on the order of 20%, which may contribute to the difference between EMUS and HUT values (see England et al., 2022, this issue, and Jain et al., 2022, this issue). We also note that FUSE values at a similar L S are substantially brighter than those measured by EMUS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancy between the values could be due to HUT observations covering northern latitudes, where we expect less of Ar as it increases closer to the southern latitudes (see Section 3.4). In addition, EMUS data shows a geophysical variability on the order of 20%, which may contribute to the difference between EMUS and HUT values (see England et al., 2022, this issue, and Jain et al., 2022, this issue). We also note that FUSE values at a similar L S are substantially brighter than those measured by EMUS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we have considered data up to the end of January 2022, due to an issue of reducing the Lyman‐α past that date (Jain et al., 2022, this issue). Specifically for our analysis of Ar I 106.6 nm variability due to geometrical, seasonal and temporal factors we utilize EMUS L2b data captured by U‐OS1 at the following conditions: Data set 1: Observed on 2021/07/02 at L s 66.4° at a phase angle of 19°, as seen in Figure 1. Data set 2: Observed on 2021/12/24 at L s 146.8° at a phase angle of 40°. …”
Section: Data Set Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2022), and a comparison of the EMUS L2A spectrum to Feldman et al., 2000 is shown in Jain et al. (2022).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Hydrogen Lyman alpha (HI 121.6 nm) is by far the brightest emission line in EMUS data, and all other emissions are sitting either on the shorter wavelength side or the longer wavelength side of this bright emission feature. Hence, the spectral smearing of an atomic line is characterized by the instrument Line Spread Function (LSF) (Chaffin et al, 2015(Chaffin et al, , 2018Deighan et al, 2015;Jain et al, 2022). This background is subtracted by calculating the baseline fit based on the shorter wavelength and longer wavelength sides of 130.4 nm core, that falls on the Lyman alpha wing, but not on the 130.4 nm emission feature itself.…”
Section: Emus Cross Exospheric and Background Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%