2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology, genetic characterization and phylogeny of Aplectana dayaoshanensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Ascaridida) from frogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Rhigonematomorpha, only 21 nominal species have been genetically characterized [14-17, 19, 20], and most of the data available are represented by the 18S and 28S sequences, which are commonly used for molecular phylogeny of higher taxa within Nematoda [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Although the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the mitochondrial cox1 and cox2 genes are widely used as powerful and practical genetic markers for revealing sibling or cryptic species, delimiting phenotypic variation and identifying species in the infraorders Ascaridomorpha, Spiruromorpha and Oxyuridomorpha [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], they have been scarcely employed in studies pertaining to Rhigonematomorpha species. Consequently, no current knowledge on the effectiveness of ITS, cox1 and cox2 as genetic markers for identification of Rhigonematomorpha nematodes is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Rhigonematomorpha, only 21 nominal species have been genetically characterized [14-17, 19, 20], and most of the data available are represented by the 18S and 28S sequences, which are commonly used for molecular phylogeny of higher taxa within Nematoda [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Although the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the mitochondrial cox1 and cox2 genes are widely used as powerful and practical genetic markers for revealing sibling or cryptic species, delimiting phenotypic variation and identifying species in the infraorders Ascaridomorpha, Spiruromorpha and Oxyuridomorpha [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], they have been scarcely employed in studies pertaining to Rhigonematomorpha species. Consequently, no current knowledge on the effectiveness of ITS, cox1 and cox2 as genetic markers for identification of Rhigonematomorpha nematodes is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…being mainly studied wild frogs obtained directly from their habitat, where several authors report the presence of gastrointestinal parasites in 100% of the animals examined (Cabral et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2021;Li et al, 2013;Sou et al, 2018). Being identified mainly parasites belonging to trematodes, acanthocephalans and cestodes, where the prevalence reported for each of the parasites found is variable due to the different environmental conditions, present in each study area (Bolek et al, 2003;Bolek & Janovy, 2007;Chen et al, 2021;Li et al, 2013;Sou et al, 2018). These results indicate that the overall prevalence of intestinal parasites found in our study is high and similar to the observed by other authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can also facilitate adaptions in their host physiology, acting as a major force to promote their coevolution. Parasitic infections are highly prevalent in amphibians, but few systematic studies have been conducted on this topic [ 2 ] . The order Ascaridomorpha, a typical representative of large parasitic nematodes [ 3 ] , contains five families: Ascaridoidea, Cosmocercoidea, Heterakoidea, Seuratoidea and Subuluroidea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%