2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-006-0679-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and Properties of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Polycarbonate Alloy Toughened with Different Kinds of Elastomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increment in the flexural strength was attributed to the good interfacial adhesion between the phases. The maleic anhydride functional group of SEBS ‐g‐ MA reacts with hydroxyl end group of PET and PC, which attribute to strengthen interfacial adhesion and improve the compatibility between components as reported by Tang et al . The decrease in the flexural strength at higher SEBS loading can be related to elastomeric nature of the excess SEBS ‐g‐ MA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The increment in the flexural strength was attributed to the good interfacial adhesion between the phases. The maleic anhydride functional group of SEBS ‐g‐ MA reacts with hydroxyl end group of PET and PC, which attribute to strengthen interfacial adhesion and improve the compatibility between components as reported by Tang et al . The decrease in the flexural strength at higher SEBS loading can be related to elastomeric nature of the excess SEBS ‐g‐ MA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This could be attributed to the compatibilization effect of SEBS ‐g‐ MA. The compatibility of the polymers will be improved by maleic anhydride grafted elastomer, because the functional group (–MA) reacts with end group (–OH) of PET and PC, which strengthen interfacial adhesion and improve the compatibility between components . The homogeneous and fibrillar morphology were observed with incorporation of 10 and 20 phr SEBS ‐g‐ MA [Figure (c,d)].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, most polymer blend pairs, including PET/PP blends, are thermodynamically incompatible, thus it tends to grossly separate. The incompatible blends lead to an inhomogeneous system with poor interfacial adhesion and results in poor mechanical properties . It is difficult to obtain a good dispersion in polymer blends, particularly for combinations of nonpolar with polar polymers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%