1937
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and Orientation of the Embryo of Isoetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1938
1938
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are in substantial agreement with conclusions reached by LaMotte (1936) on the basis of his study of the embryology of Isoetes.…”
Section: -Isupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of this study are in substantial agreement with conclusions reached by LaMotte (1936) on the basis of his study of the embryology of Isoetes.…”
Section: -Isupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The reserve function is even morphologically reinforced in some Selaginella species by a septum separating the gametophyte from the bulk of the megaspore contents (Robert ; Gifford and Foster ). Similar nutrient stores are observed in the megaspores of other lineages of free‐sporing heterosporous plants (Campbell ; La Motte ; Schneider and Pryer ). Although it remains to demonstrate experimentally that these reserves provide an advantage for establishment of new sporophytes under natural conditions, the mechanisms that would create an advantage for Selaginella —greater survival rate and better etiolation response under litter, shade or competitive pressure (Leishman and Westoby ) —are no different to those acting in seeds, where such effects have been abundantly demonstrated (Salisbury ; Leishman and Westoby ; Rees ; Milberg et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the former, a massive foot forms from all hypobasal derivatives as in the psilophytes (Bierhorst 1971), ophioglossaceous ferns (Foster 1964), Equisetum (Campbell 1928), and subterranean schizaeaceous ferns (Bierhorst 1975) and provides nourishment for the embryo before it gains nutritional independence. In the latter, fewer early formative derivatives contribute to the foot compared to the larger absorptive shoot and root as in the Marattiales (Campbell 1894;Brebner 1896) or protocorm as in lycophytes (Treub 1890;Bruchmann 1912;LaMotte 1937). As in exoscopic ferns, C. richardii lacks an absorptive shoot and quickly emerges from the gametophyte; however, as in endoscopy, an early RAM forms alongside a relatively smaller foot.…”
Section: Embryology Reflects the Mechanical Constraints Imposed By Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During foot proliferation, early vacuolization and associated cell expansion results in increased surface area that facilitates nutrient uptake (Ward 1954). Unlike endoscopic lycophytes, where foot expansion pushes and re-orients the embryonic axis in the gametophyte (Treub 1890;Bruchmann 1912;LaMotte 1937), foot expansion in Ceratopteris anchors the embryonic axis in its pre-established orientation.…”
Section: Embryology Reflects the Mechanical Constraints Imposed By Thmentioning
confidence: 99%