“…Myxospore dimensions of the new species are smaller than those of O. orientalis from navaga Eleginus gracilis (Tilesius, 1810) and Eleginus nawaga (Walbaum, 1792) but larger than those of O. orientalis from Atlantic herring Clupea harengus Linnaeus, 1758, Pacific herring, Clupea pallasi Valenciennes, 1847, Alaska Pollock, Gadus chalcogrammus Pallas, 1814, red mullet, Mullus barbatus ponticus Essipov, 1927, Black Sea shad, Alosa tanaica (Grimm, 1901) (Shulman and Shulman-Albova, 1953 ; Aseeva, 2000 ; Karlsbakk and Køie, 2011 ; Özer et al ., 2015 a ). The polar capsules of the new species are larger than those of O. orientalis from C. pallasii and E. nawaga , O. labracis from the European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax (Linnaeus, 1758), O. scatophagi from the spotted scat, Scatophagus argus (Linnaeus, 1766) but, smaller than those of O. mullusi from M. barbatus ponticus, O. auratae from the gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata (Linnaeus, 1758), O. alata from the northern butterflyfish, Chaetodon rainfordi McCulloch, 1923, and O. striateculus from silver fish, Leptatherina presbyteroides (Richardson, 1843) (Shulman and Shulman-Albova, 1953 ; Kent and Moser, 1990 ; Su and White, 1994 ; Özer et al ., 2015 a ; Rangel et al ., 2017 ; Gürkanlı et al ., 2018 ; Chandran et al ., 2020 ). Ortholinea saudii from marbled spinefoot Siganus rivulatus (Abdel-Baki et al ., 2015 ) own too large polar capsules and myxospores compared to the new species in the present study.…”