1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.1975.tb01637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and genesis of nodular chalks and hardgrounds in the Upper Cretaceous of southern England

Abstract: The Upper Cretaceous chalks of southern England are a thick sequence of rhythmically bedded, bioturbated coccolith micrites, deposited in an outer shelf environment in water depths which varied between 50 and 200–300 m. The products of sea floor cementation are widely represented in the sequence, and a series of stages of progressive lithification can be recognized. These began with a pause in sedimentation and the formation of an omission surface, followed by (a) growth of discrete nodules below the sediment‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
4

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
103
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Early lithification of chalky sediment (e.g., hardground development) may require only a few hundred years at depths of 50-100 m during relatively shallow water phases associated with regional regression (cf. Kennedy & Garrison 1975); such a combination is fully compatible with an early stage in the shallowing of the Amuri Limestone. According to Kennedy & Garrison (1975), glauconitisation was consistently earlier than phosphatisation in the European chalks (also cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Early lithification of chalky sediment (e.g., hardground development) may require only a few hundred years at depths of 50-100 m during relatively shallow water phases associated with regional regression (cf. Kennedy & Garrison 1975); such a combination is fully compatible with an early stage in the shallowing of the Amuri Limestone. According to Kennedy & Garrison (1975), glauconitisation was consistently earlier than phosphatisation in the European chalks (also cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The sedimentation rate can be estimated for the Coniacian Chalk because it is uncemented and uniformly compacted and omission surfaces, i.e. times of nondeposition, are poorly developed (Kennedy & Garrison, 1975). The Coniacian had a duration of 1.0 million years (Harland et al, 1982) and has a thickness of 55 m, so the sedimentation rate was 5.5 cm 1000 y-1.…”
Section: Sedimentation Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of these fossils suggests shallower conditions than those reigning during the Late Maas trichtian. In addition, and according to Kennedy and Garrison ( 1975), the colonization of the surface by epi zoans plus with the presence of abundant borings allows this surface to be classified as a well-developed hardground. The deposits that make up the host rock of the hard ground yielded the following association of planktonic foraminifera: A. mayaroensis, Contusotmncana contusa, Globotruncana conica, Racemiguembelina fmcticosa, Rugoglohigerina rotundata, and Rugoglohigerina scorti.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%