2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00418-012-0939-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and chemical characteristics of subepithelial laminar nerve endings in the rat epiglottic mucosa

Abstract: The laminar nerve endings are distributed in the laryngeal mucosa, and described as sensory receptors evoked by laryngeal pressure changes. The present study aimed to determine detailed morphological characteristics of the laryngeal laminar endings of the rat. Immunohistochemistry for Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, α(3) subunit, showed that laminar endings were distributed in the entire laryngeal surface of the epiglottis. The parent axons of the endings were thick in diameter, and they were branched and continued to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(105 reference statements)
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P2X3‐immunoreactive lamellar processes of subserosal nerve endings extended in every direction on the surface of longitudinal smooth muscle layers, unlike muscle spindle afferents and vagal afferent IMAs that are arranged in axes with intrafusal muscle fibers and gastric smooth muscle layers, respectively (Powley et al, 2013; Schoultz & Swett, 1974). Furthermore, two‐dimensionally extended net‐like terminal structures formed by multiple parent axons of P2X3‐immunoreactive nerve endings have been shown to resemble mechanosensory endings such as the laminar endings in the laryngeal mucosa (Soda & Yamamoto, 2012), and sensory endings in airway smooth muscle (Brouns et al, 2006) and visceral pleura (Pintelon et al, 2007). Since antral web endings were formed by a subset (41%) of vagal afferents forming IMAs in the LM layers, as shown by anterograde tracing into the rat NG (Powley et al, 2012; Powley et al, 2016), P2X3‐immunoreactive subserosal nerve endings may be a subtype of vagal mechanoreceptors in the distal antrum of the lesser curvature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…P2X3‐immunoreactive lamellar processes of subserosal nerve endings extended in every direction on the surface of longitudinal smooth muscle layers, unlike muscle spindle afferents and vagal afferent IMAs that are arranged in axes with intrafusal muscle fibers and gastric smooth muscle layers, respectively (Powley et al, 2013; Schoultz & Swett, 1974). Furthermore, two‐dimensionally extended net‐like terminal structures formed by multiple parent axons of P2X3‐immunoreactive nerve endings have been shown to resemble mechanosensory endings such as the laminar endings in the laryngeal mucosa (Soda & Yamamoto, 2012), and sensory endings in airway smooth muscle (Brouns et al, 2006) and visceral pleura (Pintelon et al, 2007). Since antral web endings were formed by a subset (41%) of vagal afferents forming IMAs in the LM layers, as shown by anterograde tracing into the rat NG (Powley et al, 2012; Powley et al, 2016), P2X3‐immunoreactive subserosal nerve endings may be a subtype of vagal mechanoreceptors in the distal antrum of the lesser curvature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous immunohistochemical studies have revealed that terminal Schwann cells tightly surround axon terminals of mechanoreceptors, such as Ruffini endings in the periodontal ligaments (Maeda et al, 1999; Takahashi‐Iwanaga et al, 1997), laminar endings in the laryngeal mucosa (Soda & Yamamoto, 2012), and arterial baroreceptor endings in the aortic arch and carotid sinus (Krauhs, 1979; Yokoyama et al, 2019). In P2X3‐immunoreactive subserosal nerve endings, axon terminals surrounded these cells and projected pleomorphic and thread‐like protrusions to the surrounding tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, P2X3‐immunoreactive axonal twigs from different axons interdigitated to form a large complex of nerve endings. The interdigitating arrangement of P2X3‐immunoreactive nerve endings resembles the anatomical arrangement of subepithelial laminar endings in the epiglottis (Soda & Yamamoto, ) and one of the vagal afferent endings in the pyloric sphincter, intramuscular arrays (IMAs; Powley et al, ). These nerve endings widely covered the epiglottic mucosa and pyloric sphincter, respectively, by multiple nerve endings from different axons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Morphological differences between nerve endings immunoreactive to P2X3 and CGRP have also been reported in the skin (Taylor, Peleshok, & Ribeiro-da-Silva, 2009), intrapulmonary airways (Brouns et al, 2009), and laryngeal mucosa (Soda & Yamamoto, 2012;Takahashi et al, 2016). It is well-known that CGRP is one of the immunohistochemical markers for unmyelinated C-fiber nociceptors activated by various endogenous and exogeneous noxious stimuli, that is, hydrogen ions, reactive oxygen species, and capsaicin via TRPV1 channels (review see, Lee & Yu, 2014).…”
Section: Differences Between P2x3-immunoreactive Nerve Endings and mentioning
confidence: 89%