2000
DOI: 10.2307/4117760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and Anatomy of Fruits in New World Boehmeria in Relation to Taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pouzolzia often differs in its caducous stigma and strongly longitudinally ribbed perianth, but the only absolute distinction is its shiny rather than dull achene easily detachable from perianth at maturity and (usually) caducous stigma; the major differences between the two are in the anatomy of the fruiting perianth and outer layers of the achene (Kravtsova et al 2000, Kravtsova 2001, Wilmot-Dear et al 2009). Pipturus is distinguishable only by the pistillate perianth, which is succulent at maturity with a dark opening, a 'dark hole', at the apex after the early-caducous stigma has fallen.…”
Section: The Position Of Boehmeria In Tribus Boehmerieaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pouzolzia often differs in its caducous stigma and strongly longitudinally ribbed perianth, but the only absolute distinction is its shiny rather than dull achene easily detachable from perianth at maturity and (usually) caducous stigma; the major differences between the two are in the anatomy of the fruiting perianth and outer layers of the achene (Kravtsova et al 2000, Kravtsova 2001, Wilmot-Dear et al 2009). Pipturus is distinguishable only by the pistillate perianth, which is succulent at maturity with a dark opening, a 'dark hole', at the apex after the early-caducous stigma has fallen.…”
Section: The Position Of Boehmeria In Tribus Boehmerieaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilmot-Dear & Friis (1996: 8-11 & 71) demonstrated that the only entirely consistent morphological distinctions between these two genera were certain characters of the fruit. Subsequent anatomical studies (Kravtsova, 2001;Kravtsova et al, 2000Kravtsova et al, , 2003 demonstrated that these characters reflect underlying structural differences within both the fruiting perianth and pericarp. These morphological and anatomical distinctions are summarised in Table 1 and discussed below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was found in the result of comparative anatomical examination [25][26][27] that few layered, in many genera of the same type, highly specialized pericarp, often strongly mineralized, has been formed in parallel with foregoing processes of fruit complication and aggregation. Strongly reduced seed coat in Urticaceae is represented by tanniniferous membrane, brown or greenish due to chloroplasts, sometimes (Urtica) adhering to the pericarp.…”
Section: Urticaceaementioning
confidence: 99%